Behzad jaan;
I did not want to reply to this issue anymore. But some of your points, needs clarification. Some I agree. Some I dont or partially do.
1/ You did not get my point in the belief issue. I said the focus of some in this board and in Iranian media was on a couple of issues. When things are like this, some with a believe in the contrary will be obliged to reply to those issues constantly. Therefore, it seems like they have a strong view "only" in those issues. Branko, Daei and Dadkan were the main focus. Some of us attempted to tell those people that the problem is beyond that and certain criticisms are not valid cause it mainly stems from some other fundamental issues.
2/ I never mentioned of anyone saving themselves for their clubs in THIS particular world cup. I never mentioned a name even in previous world cups we attended. It happened in the road to world cup, especially in the past, but not world cup itself. Karimi in this world cup played a little safe. And that was understandable for his injury. Karimi's fault was not how crippled he was in this world cup in his foot. It was how crippled he was in his brain.
3/ Now individual players one by one as you mentioned names.
Kia:
At a point in the past and right after he joined bundesliga, he also played very very safe in a few games. Still, blame should not be put on him. Infact most of the players (except Daei as an example) who went to foreign leagues acted the exact same way.
They basically wanted to be with their club cause they thought their absence and missed practices and some games would threaten their place in their clubs. Well, to some extent that was true. But there was always a moral issue involved too. Also there was a realisation later on by those players that, bundesliga cares less for your dedication to the team especially if you are a foreigner. Basically, if you perform well, you will be there. Its based on performance and not your dedication if you are a foreigner.
Hashemian:
Despite Hashemian's good performance, in my opinion, Hashemian should have never been invited to TeamMelli the way it happened. the blame is not on Hashemian to come to TeamMelli at all. Its on people who brought him in the way we did.
Hashemisn or any other player for that matter should decide on their own. For a frikkin reason, they should decide if they want to be a part of it, or they want to stay out. Hashemian's invitation made the "atmosphere" calm a bit. But it ruined the future of our football in one way. When you do such a thing, you virtually create people like Mobali and karimi. The perfect "abuse" scenario.
Karimi:
A by product of a deficient culture and Hashemian. a rebel by all means. A person at a wrong time and a wrong place.
Karimi was injured. Thats true. But, if he was a patriot as many of you portray him, he should have excused himself from the team when he realized that he can not play well.
For Karimi this world cup meant nothing. Karimi is a sort of player who deos not give a damn about his football as a means of bringing excitement to the football lovers. He does what he does for himself. He has never been a "achiever" either. If it was not for his manager and his ambitions, he woukd have stayed in UAE for years. He was earning his money, and he dribbled them left and right.
Karimi knew that this world cup absolutely means nothing for his future prospects. His contract was extended and he knew that once you are in German market, your performance in that market determines your ultimate value.
Karimi, characteristically, does not give a shit about progress either. I bet you, he will be in bayern for as long as possible and then his carrier will end. He will not be competitive anymore.
4/ As for evidence. Football has two sides. There is a side that if one does not have enough knowledge about, you cant judge. One has to have inside knowledge about it. This side is the "reason" side of the football. It means, you see something, but you can not know the reason.
The other side of football is what is being seen by the expectators. Among them are "baghal", "chaghal", sport person, student, 12 year old , 90 yera old individuals.
So basically, when I watch a game of football, I can see, but i cant judge with confidence of why I see what I see.
Just by watching, one can easily compare football levels, football desire, fighting spirit of a team. Just by watching, you could see all of that at its highest in many teams in world cup 2006 (like Trinidad & Tobago for example as the most inexperienced ones), but you could not see it in TeamMelli.
Foreigners call this a teams "desire", "fighting spirit" or "stamina". In farsi we sum all up and call it "gheyrat". I do agree that this is not an exact translation that can be used. Gheyrat is a strong word in farsi. We should avaoid using it in football. But basically and for today, this is also among one the flaws that should be corrected.
Therefore, its ok to have an opinion in what you see. But when it comes to why's and one wants to religiously defend it, one needs evidence.
5/ Dadkan and Branko never attributed success to their name. There not a shred of evidence for that. I never recall any of them to use any other word than "we".
Branko was a pure gentelman. He ALWAYS defended his players. He NEVER talked a single thing against any of his players.
Dadkan however is also a victim of "jahl" in Iran. When "PEOPLE" see football only within the framework of "Certain Players" and fail to see a "TEAM", one has to come out and defend his rights. One has to tell people what has been done to "TRY" to create such a success. Ofcourse, in the end, success is Mellat e Iran's. But we need to learn that reaching it is an outcome of a very, very hard work by many, "including but not limitted to Players".
Since we have absolutely no understanding of a "Teamwork" accross our culture, we fail to mention it. When that happens, there is a need for someone to come up and say " Namak nashnasee ham haddi dareh".
Mer30
Soheil
I did not want to reply to this issue anymore. But some of your points, needs clarification. Some I agree. Some I dont or partially do.
1/ You did not get my point in the belief issue. I said the focus of some in this board and in Iranian media was on a couple of issues. When things are like this, some with a believe in the contrary will be obliged to reply to those issues constantly. Therefore, it seems like they have a strong view "only" in those issues. Branko, Daei and Dadkan were the main focus. Some of us attempted to tell those people that the problem is beyond that and certain criticisms are not valid cause it mainly stems from some other fundamental issues.
2/ I never mentioned of anyone saving themselves for their clubs in THIS particular world cup. I never mentioned a name even in previous world cups we attended. It happened in the road to world cup, especially in the past, but not world cup itself. Karimi in this world cup played a little safe. And that was understandable for his injury. Karimi's fault was not how crippled he was in this world cup in his foot. It was how crippled he was in his brain.
3/ Now individual players one by one as you mentioned names.
Kia:
At a point in the past and right after he joined bundesliga, he also played very very safe in a few games. Still, blame should not be put on him. Infact most of the players (except Daei as an example) who went to foreign leagues acted the exact same way.
They basically wanted to be with their club cause they thought their absence and missed practices and some games would threaten their place in their clubs. Well, to some extent that was true. But there was always a moral issue involved too. Also there was a realisation later on by those players that, bundesliga cares less for your dedication to the team especially if you are a foreigner. Basically, if you perform well, you will be there. Its based on performance and not your dedication if you are a foreigner.
Hashemian:
Despite Hashemian's good performance, in my opinion, Hashemian should have never been invited to TeamMelli the way it happened. the blame is not on Hashemian to come to TeamMelli at all. Its on people who brought him in the way we did.
Hashemisn or any other player for that matter should decide on their own. For a frikkin reason, they should decide if they want to be a part of it, or they want to stay out. Hashemian's invitation made the "atmosphere" calm a bit. But it ruined the future of our football in one way. When you do such a thing, you virtually create people like Mobali and karimi. The perfect "abuse" scenario.
Karimi:
A by product of a deficient culture and Hashemian. a rebel by all means. A person at a wrong time and a wrong place.
Karimi was injured. Thats true. But, if he was a patriot as many of you portray him, he should have excused himself from the team when he realized that he can not play well.
For Karimi this world cup meant nothing. Karimi is a sort of player who deos not give a damn about his football as a means of bringing excitement to the football lovers. He does what he does for himself. He has never been a "achiever" either. If it was not for his manager and his ambitions, he woukd have stayed in UAE for years. He was earning his money, and he dribbled them left and right.
Karimi knew that this world cup absolutely means nothing for his future prospects. His contract was extended and he knew that once you are in German market, your performance in that market determines your ultimate value.
Karimi, characteristically, does not give a shit about progress either. I bet you, he will be in bayern for as long as possible and then his carrier will end. He will not be competitive anymore.
4/ As for evidence. Football has two sides. There is a side that if one does not have enough knowledge about, you cant judge. One has to have inside knowledge about it. This side is the "reason" side of the football. It means, you see something, but you can not know the reason.
The other side of football is what is being seen by the expectators. Among them are "baghal", "chaghal", sport person, student, 12 year old , 90 yera old individuals.
So basically, when I watch a game of football, I can see, but i cant judge with confidence of why I see what I see.
Just by watching, one can easily compare football levels, football desire, fighting spirit of a team. Just by watching, you could see all of that at its highest in many teams in world cup 2006 (like Trinidad & Tobago for example as the most inexperienced ones), but you could not see it in TeamMelli.
Foreigners call this a teams "desire", "fighting spirit" or "stamina". In farsi we sum all up and call it "gheyrat". I do agree that this is not an exact translation that can be used. Gheyrat is a strong word in farsi. We should avaoid using it in football. But basically and for today, this is also among one the flaws that should be corrected.
Therefore, its ok to have an opinion in what you see. But when it comes to why's and one wants to religiously defend it, one needs evidence.
5/ Dadkan and Branko never attributed success to their name. There not a shred of evidence for that. I never recall any of them to use any other word than "we".
Branko was a pure gentelman. He ALWAYS defended his players. He NEVER talked a single thing against any of his players.
Dadkan however is also a victim of "jahl" in Iran. When "PEOPLE" see football only within the framework of "Certain Players" and fail to see a "TEAM", one has to come out and defend his rights. One has to tell people what has been done to "TRY" to create such a success. Ofcourse, in the end, success is Mellat e Iran's. But we need to learn that reaching it is an outcome of a very, very hard work by many, "including but not limitted to Players".
Since we have absolutely no understanding of a "Teamwork" accross our culture, we fail to mention it. When that happens, there is a need for someone to come up and say " Namak nashnasee ham haddi dareh".
Mer30
Soheil
Comment