so it is amateurish and one-diemnsional to criticise/question bush over his iraq policy and non-existent WMD agenda ... coz we're just regular ppl and he is the prez !!
if football resembles something like nuclear science to X, it doesnt mean Y also sees it that way.
it really does NOT take a rocket scientist to see the defects in a football game and team.
and if these defects are REPEATED again and again, and then the coach comes and says there are no problems and we play very well .... then those who SUPPORT this dogmatic person, in DENIAL of truth, are the one-dimensional ones who just follow no matter what the issue .... , who accept whatever rubbish that is thrown in front of them .
just becoz they think football is nuclear physics and to understand it , it takes triple Phd's !!!!!
we have to settle for two players who CLEARLY are out of their correct roles ( zareh and nosrati ) , and accept repeated mistakes and weak performnaces by them .... but never ask why we dont put someone who actually plays in LB role in his club !!
we cannot question why amirabadi , who did very well during those measely few minutes he got, is not brought in for the next game, to at least change our views on branko's irrational and dogmatic lajbaaz attitude , who likes to play "names" and not correct players !
apparently, it takes a Phd in physical training to think : "I dont need to test ANY alternatives for a GK position, even against pisspoor oppositions like n korea, panama, lybia, .... , since just by looking at them I know who is fit to be my main keeper's alternative.
never mind the fact that I keep changing the keeper selection continuously !!"
and we , fans, since we dont have that Phd degree , are unnecessarily worried about a possible injury to mirza , and the prospects of bringing .... ummm.... X for him.
( Note : we cant even NAME the sub, since the GK's position has changed so many times, with so many names, without any serious trial, that even kaabi could be an alternative !!!!!!!!! )
if football resembles something like nuclear science to X, it doesnt mean Y also sees it that way.
it really does NOT take a rocket scientist to see the defects in a football game and team.
and if these defects are REPEATED again and again, and then the coach comes and says there are no problems and we play very well .... then those who SUPPORT this dogmatic person, in DENIAL of truth, are the one-dimensional ones who just follow no matter what the issue .... , who accept whatever rubbish that is thrown in front of them .
just becoz they think football is nuclear physics and to understand it , it takes triple Phd's !!!!!
we have to settle for two players who CLEARLY are out of their correct roles ( zareh and nosrati ) , and accept repeated mistakes and weak performnaces by them .... but never ask why we dont put someone who actually plays in LB role in his club !!
we cannot question why amirabadi , who did very well during those measely few minutes he got, is not brought in for the next game, to at least change our views on branko's irrational and dogmatic lajbaaz attitude , who likes to play "names" and not correct players !
apparently, it takes a Phd in physical training to think : "I dont need to test ANY alternatives for a GK position, even against pisspoor oppositions like n korea, panama, lybia, .... , since just by looking at them I know who is fit to be my main keeper's alternative.
never mind the fact that I keep changing the keeper selection continuously !!"
and we , fans, since we dont have that Phd degree , are unnecessarily worried about a possible injury to mirza , and the prospects of bringing .... ummm.... X for him.
( Note : we cant even NAME the sub, since the GK's position has changed so many times, with so many names, without any serious trial, that even kaabi could be an alternative !!!!!!!!! )
Comment