i think hashemian did a very good job.
he ran his ass off, BUT remember there was much difference between his situation and kaabis.
first of all, kaabi didnt run as much as hashemian, not even in the half he played.
secondly, hashemian was playing in the heart of the defense among 4 chinese defenders and didnt have much options of passing in many situations.
kaabi however, had less pressure on him from chinese and more passing options as well as more space to move around.
hashemian was very effective, he won many freekicks, he was able to single handedly keep ball possession until the rest of the team came forward, he made good dribblign and passes and even crosses in the first half but noone was there to make use of it.
in first half, our entire team was bad. nobody played good. so zandi was bad as LB, roudbarian was bad int he goal, nekounam and teymourian bad in midfield. but second half, things changed.
i think first half, we played a lot of long passes and generally the gap between our 3 lines was big but in second half,like ghalenoi had stressed before, he reduced the gap between our 3 lines and our passes became shorter and faster and much more accurate.
i was satisfied with the game, the 2 goals we conceded were goals we dont usually concede but our defense and specially GK let us down.
he ran his ass off, BUT remember there was much difference between his situation and kaabis.
first of all, kaabi didnt run as much as hashemian, not even in the half he played.
secondly, hashemian was playing in the heart of the defense among 4 chinese defenders and didnt have much options of passing in many situations.
kaabi however, had less pressure on him from chinese and more passing options as well as more space to move around.
hashemian was very effective, he won many freekicks, he was able to single handedly keep ball possession until the rest of the team came forward, he made good dribblign and passes and even crosses in the first half but noone was there to make use of it.
in first half, our entire team was bad. nobody played good. so zandi was bad as LB, roudbarian was bad int he goal, nekounam and teymourian bad in midfield. but second half, things changed.
i think first half, we played a lot of long passes and generally the gap between our 3 lines was big but in second half,like ghalenoi had stressed before, he reduced the gap between our 3 lines and our passes became shorter and faster and much more accurate.
i was satisfied with the game, the 2 goals we conceded were goals we dont usually concede but our defense and specially GK let us down.
Comment