what distinguished GN from branko, which was his guts and daring to trust in player forms rather than names, let us down in this game !
he reverted to "names-based" selection and strategy. he also suddenly got scared of the koreans ( where are those analysts and their analysis that shd have told him this korea is NOT that strong ???!! ) and changed the 4-4-2 to 3-5-2 !
in other words, he lost his guts when he came to the knock-out stage !
such a tragedy !
and I beleive this is just human nature.
those who gamble or play poker or black jack or ... know what I'm talking about.
so do those who compete in various matters with other individuals, or even those who play vid games as silly as "mine sweeper".
there comes a time when even the most ( not all, though ) aggressive person suddenly changes tact and shifts to caution.
most ppl usually start aggressively and very gung-ho , go at it head-on.
but the turning point is when they reach their primary goal.
for X it could be winning $10,000 .
for Y it could be reaching the score of 2500 points.
or ... .
a loss before such points, usually does not really scare them. that seems like a given amount of points or dollars or ... even before the start.
once they've gone past such a point, they suddenly think they shd proceed more cautiously, lest they lose what they have gained so far !
this is where we see many falter and fall.
so we must see who has what level of primary goal.
for GN, advancing from preliminary round and even group stage were "given". so he took risks and chances with line ups, players' selection, formation, ... etc. maybe the leeway of having an option or chance to redeem possible lost points gave him this daring.
I dont know.
It's just that his primary goal wasnt high enough, for he suddenly became cautious and conservative when we reached the knock-out stage.
this was his undoing.
for a coach who did take risks and tried different strategies and formation ( 4-4-2 is not his preferred one ) and subbing which all paid in good , he changed to a cautious man who second guessed himself, had doubts and tried to be conservative.
and he paid for it.
branko was also the same.
he took his chances at Busan and it paid off.
he also did reasonably well at AC04.
but once we reached the WCQ's which I presume was his primary goal ( to remain in a country which is famous for changing coaches rapidly ), he lost his nerve and became ultra-cautious ! .... progressively !!!
so, I'd say we need a coach with enough guts and daring, whose primary goal is not so low as to merely qualify for the WC.
it shd be someone who wants to make a lot of noise AT THE WC.
being a good poker player helps as well
he reverted to "names-based" selection and strategy. he also suddenly got scared of the koreans ( where are those analysts and their analysis that shd have told him this korea is NOT that strong ???!! ) and changed the 4-4-2 to 3-5-2 !
in other words, he lost his guts when he came to the knock-out stage !
such a tragedy !
and I beleive this is just human nature.
those who gamble or play poker or black jack or ... know what I'm talking about.
so do those who compete in various matters with other individuals, or even those who play vid games as silly as "mine sweeper".
there comes a time when even the most ( not all, though ) aggressive person suddenly changes tact and shifts to caution.
most ppl usually start aggressively and very gung-ho , go at it head-on.
but the turning point is when they reach their primary goal.
for X it could be winning $10,000 .
for Y it could be reaching the score of 2500 points.
or ... .
a loss before such points, usually does not really scare them. that seems like a given amount of points or dollars or ... even before the start.
once they've gone past such a point, they suddenly think they shd proceed more cautiously, lest they lose what they have gained so far !
this is where we see many falter and fall.
so we must see who has what level of primary goal.
for GN, advancing from preliminary round and even group stage were "given". so he took risks and chances with line ups, players' selection, formation, ... etc. maybe the leeway of having an option or chance to redeem possible lost points gave him this daring.
I dont know.
It's just that his primary goal wasnt high enough, for he suddenly became cautious and conservative when we reached the knock-out stage.
this was his undoing.
for a coach who did take risks and tried different strategies and formation ( 4-4-2 is not his preferred one ) and subbing which all paid in good , he changed to a cautious man who second guessed himself, had doubts and tried to be conservative.
and he paid for it.
branko was also the same.
he took his chances at Busan and it paid off.
he also did reasonably well at AC04.
but once we reached the WCQ's which I presume was his primary goal ( to remain in a country which is famous for changing coaches rapidly ), he lost his nerve and became ultra-cautious ! .... progressively !!!
so, I'd say we need a coach with enough guts and daring, whose primary goal is not so low as to merely qualify for the WC.
it shd be someone who wants to make a lot of noise AT THE WC.
being a good poker player helps as well
Comment