There was a poll conducted by PFDC prior to world cup 2006, which asked how
far do you think TM will advance in WC 2006. I think some
25% of the respondants said to the finals, all the while the odds for Iran to
make it to the finals was 250-1
In any professional sport that I know of, a teams current roster, previous
years perfomance etc is looked at and realistic goals are set for what is
expected of that team. Naturally, a coach that takes over a team that has 22-8-2
record is judged differently than a team that was just promoted. This also
applies to an organization like IFF, although we may have to think harder on
how to evaluate the head of IFFs performance.
The reason I am opening this thread, is to get your collective opinion on:
1-How should Mr.Kafashian be evaluated?
(given that he will be IFF head for at least 3 years).
2-How should Clemente be evaluated?
I think it is very important for us as fans to set specific goals and expectation and try to objectively rate the success or failure of both of these very important individuals in our lives for the forseeable future.
After I get a collection of suggestions and criteria for this task, and we
discussed them in length and reached a rough consensus, we can
hopefully edit and put it for public (football forum) poll and then call it PFDCs
ranking.
This will include minimum performance requirement for both jobs, adaquate
performance and then excellent performance.
Without further due, I would like to turn this to you, for your input:
For both Mr.Kafashian and Coach Clemente, please state
a-minimum (a C or passing grade)
b-adaquate(a B or did a fine job)
c-Above (an A or really a superb perfromance beyound what we thought
was realistically was possible and required great vision and delievery.
Also there needs to be a progress report interval, for instance we can
have monthly, quarterly or semi-annual etc rating. The goals also can
be short term (next 2 months), medium term (6 month - 1 year) and long term (1-5 years).
Please give your opinion on this, regardless of if it has been already mentioned by another member, that way I can tally the true support for a given criteria.
If you dont think this is a worthwhile thing to do, please also state your reason.
far do you think TM will advance in WC 2006. I think some
25% of the respondants said to the finals, all the while the odds for Iran to
make it to the finals was 250-1
In any professional sport that I know of, a teams current roster, previous
years perfomance etc is looked at and realistic goals are set for what is
expected of that team. Naturally, a coach that takes over a team that has 22-8-2
record is judged differently than a team that was just promoted. This also
applies to an organization like IFF, although we may have to think harder on
how to evaluate the head of IFFs performance.
The reason I am opening this thread, is to get your collective opinion on:
1-How should Mr.Kafashian be evaluated?
(given that he will be IFF head for at least 3 years).
2-How should Clemente be evaluated?
I think it is very important for us as fans to set specific goals and expectation and try to objectively rate the success or failure of both of these very important individuals in our lives for the forseeable future.
After I get a collection of suggestions and criteria for this task, and we
discussed them in length and reached a rough consensus, we can
hopefully edit and put it for public (football forum) poll and then call it PFDCs
ranking.
This will include minimum performance requirement for both jobs, adaquate
performance and then excellent performance.
Without further due, I would like to turn this to you, for your input:
For both Mr.Kafashian and Coach Clemente, please state
a-minimum (a C or passing grade)
b-adaquate(a B or did a fine job)
c-Above (an A or really a superb perfromance beyound what we thought
was realistically was possible and required great vision and delievery.
Also there needs to be a progress report interval, for instance we can
have monthly, quarterly or semi-annual etc rating. The goals also can
be short term (next 2 months), medium term (6 month - 1 year) and long term (1-5 years).
Please give your opinion on this, regardless of if it has been already mentioned by another member, that way I can tally the true support for a given criteria.
If you dont think this is a worthwhile thing to do, please also state your reason.
Comment