After watching Kia mistakeless but highlight-less in German Cup, I started thinking about eg. Kaebi would have done instead. He surely would have made more mistakes than the very experienced but cautious Kia, but he would have had several outstanding scenes as well - decisive scenes, positively as well as negatively.
Now I wonder what you think is better. 2 players with roughly the same quality, but one solid without any ups and downs, no blunders but no or very little risk, or a player with great scenes but also more blunders at the same time?
Is one better than the other? Is there a mix needed? And does it depend on the position as well?
Please share your thoughts. Rather generally and not directly about Kaebi vs. Kia, but you can talk about that as well if you feel the strong urge to do so.
Now I wonder what you think is better. 2 players with roughly the same quality, but one solid without any ups and downs, no blunders but no or very little risk, or a player with great scenes but also more blunders at the same time?
Is one better than the other? Is there a mix needed? And does it depend on the position as well?
Please share your thoughts. Rather generally and not directly about Kaebi vs. Kia, but you can talk about that as well if you feel the strong urge to do so.
Comment