Originally posted by Martin-Reza
View Post
1- LOL
plz tell me you are JOKING about that comment on ksa game.
this is what I expect from general forum fellows, not F+.
we have seen enough games to know a team/player can play horribly and still get away with it ... due to a variety of reasons such as incompetence of , bad luck for opposition or other players covering this player's mistakes and errors and ..... etc. etc. etc.
this black-n-white or "1 or 0" attitude gets us nowhere.
there are games we've played like high school kids, and have won. does that score-line on the board magically wipe away all the bad passes, lacks and failures in the game away and make the team look like barca?
so lets stay away from this peculiar reasoning, shall we?
2- that's why I wanted to know exactly WHAT do the coaching staff base their decisions on.
is it the player's league performances? zareh doesnt even play as LB
is it his training session performances? zareh isnt translating his magnificent form from training to official game.
and what criteria ?
do they not see his high number of turn-overs?
or repeated wrong passes?
or constant wrong/bad positioning?
or consistent losing his mark?
or falling behind the opposite number?
or getting passed, dribbled and tricked repeatedly?
so what is it that they base it on?
coz he's a "nice & friendly fellow" who doesnt talk back or say a word?
is that it ?
===============
3- now, why do I pick on zareh?
it's rather elementary my dear Watson. I see him ( based on his official performances ) as the weak link in our TM.
if we had another fellow, rest assured I'd have included that chap as well ( hint: sadeghi )
if he had played even a half of his games well, I'd have given him the benefit of the doubt. but he hasnt.
his bad passing, missing in action, bad marking, turn-overs, .... are constant in his games.
hence my argument.
Comment