Of the 23 on TM roster, a tendency among our fan is to think of the non-starting
12 as "bench warmer". Our football tradition has been the main force behind this
way of thinking, although coach Branko's substitution decision has also re-enforced this.
Historically, lack of depth in the TM's roster has fueled this trend when the
bench was noticebly weaker than the starters. While clearly couple of our starters
are head and shoulder above the rest, fortunately the gap has diminished to
a great extent over the past few years.
We are at a point that almost all TM players can be replaced by none-starters with
good results. The most outstanding examples of these have been Daei's injury and
replacement with Borhani, as well as clean up of our back row (with Rahman
and Badavi) expulsion and Nosrati's redcard in WC qual games and Asian cup
respectively.
Players get injured, red carded or simply may be too fatigued from playing closely
scheduled matches at WC. All of which means, the team will be as good as how
the entire 23 players have prepared for WC and not just the starting 11.
With that in mind, it behooves coach Bronko to let our non-starters start in
some of the friendlies, and not just in the form of replacing six players concurrently
in the second half. What the first half of Costa Rica game showed, was that our
starters can put up a good show on short notice, but what if the pilars of the team
(heaven forbids) Mehdi or Ali get redcarded or can't play? Have the subs been
adaquately prepared for WC pressure?
FIFA is considering postponing the roster deadline to end of May or early June, and
while this may give coaches more time to select their final 23 roster, it also
means all those who are being considered must get a chance to adaquately prepare.
With that in mind, I hope coach Branko decides to let our bench players assume
starting position in upcoming friendlies to gain valuable experience.
Go Iran
12 as "bench warmer". Our football tradition has been the main force behind this
way of thinking, although coach Branko's substitution decision has also re-enforced this.
Historically, lack of depth in the TM's roster has fueled this trend when the
bench was noticebly weaker than the starters. While clearly couple of our starters
are head and shoulder above the rest, fortunately the gap has diminished to
a great extent over the past few years.
We are at a point that almost all TM players can be replaced by none-starters with
good results. The most outstanding examples of these have been Daei's injury and
replacement with Borhani, as well as clean up of our back row (with Rahman
and Badavi) expulsion and Nosrati's redcard in WC qual games and Asian cup
respectively.
Players get injured, red carded or simply may be too fatigued from playing closely
scheduled matches at WC. All of which means, the team will be as good as how
the entire 23 players have prepared for WC and not just the starting 11.
With that in mind, it behooves coach Bronko to let our non-starters start in
some of the friendlies, and not just in the form of replacing six players concurrently
in the second half. What the first half of Costa Rica game showed, was that our
starters can put up a good show on short notice, but what if the pilars of the team
(heaven forbids) Mehdi or Ali get redcarded or can't play? Have the subs been
adaquately prepared for WC pressure?
FIFA is considering postponing the roster deadline to end of May or early June, and
while this may give coaches more time to select their final 23 roster, it also
means all those who are being considered must get a chance to adaquately prepare.
With that in mind, I hope coach Branko decides to let our bench players assume
starting position in upcoming friendlies to gain valuable experience.
Go Iran
Comment