First half observations:
I guess this is yet another argument in favor of dropping the 2 def-mids for Iranian teams.
- Ando , despite his great defensive work, cannot lead a team. Very poor in forward moves.
- Ashoubi cant lead a team. His forward contributions has been zero!
- And surprisingly, zandi hasn’t been able to, and is very relaxed and languid, as if he doesn’t care !! I must say my perception of Cyprus league fell even more than before !
This TM’s problem is the lack of a player to LEAD it in offense and this kind of formation doesn’t allow for such a player unless we use a playmaker in for either ashoubi or ando.
==============
And I think we got our answer to the LB question too; hajsafi is NO answer to the LB problem.
Lets hope ashjari recuperates quickly
==============
and I was hoping we'd got our answer w regards to the SINGLE forward line ups given OUR strikers a loooong time ago.
and yet .... !!!
we need TWO guys up there, otherwise all VH's efforts will be wasted and we're mainly tiring him and nothing else !
=========================
SECOND HALF :
not bringing in a creative MIDFIELDER, shows ghotbi didn’t pinpoint the problem of the team.
Bringing in 3 attacking players with noone to create passes for them is going to a race with a great car but w no tyres !!!
Poor coaching & game reading!
----------------
So far 4 of ghotbi’s experiments have resulted in failures.
1- ashoubi
2- mohamad as LB
3- hajsafi as LB
4- a TM without a playmaker ( just becoz he wants both ashoubi & ando in !!! )
---------------
and it shd be evident that haydari is better than kaabi at the moment
------------
and having 2 def mid NEVER covered the area in front of the defenders !!!
despite having TWO players there, we kept on surrendering that crucial zone in the middle to the chinese ..... IN A FREAKING FRIENDLY !!!
I shudder to think how they'll do against a maximum motivated NKorean team.
oh, wait.
I think I do know.
it's going to be the SAME SH*T we've seen in the past whenever we used two DEFENSIVE-MINDED players there.
same crap, same results.
so why the insistence, then?
I guess this is yet another argument in favor of dropping the 2 def-mids for Iranian teams.
- Ando , despite his great defensive work, cannot lead a team. Very poor in forward moves.
- Ashoubi cant lead a team. His forward contributions has been zero!
- And surprisingly, zandi hasn’t been able to, and is very relaxed and languid, as if he doesn’t care !! I must say my perception of Cyprus league fell even more than before !
This TM’s problem is the lack of a player to LEAD it in offense and this kind of formation doesn’t allow for such a player unless we use a playmaker in for either ashoubi or ando.
==============
And I think we got our answer to the LB question too; hajsafi is NO answer to the LB problem.
Lets hope ashjari recuperates quickly
==============
and I was hoping we'd got our answer w regards to the SINGLE forward line ups given OUR strikers a loooong time ago.
and yet .... !!!
we need TWO guys up there, otherwise all VH's efforts will be wasted and we're mainly tiring him and nothing else !
=========================
SECOND HALF :
not bringing in a creative MIDFIELDER, shows ghotbi didn’t pinpoint the problem of the team.
Bringing in 3 attacking players with noone to create passes for them is going to a race with a great car but w no tyres !!!
Poor coaching & game reading!
----------------
So far 4 of ghotbi’s experiments have resulted in failures.
1- ashoubi
2- mohamad as LB
3- hajsafi as LB
4- a TM without a playmaker ( just becoz he wants both ashoubi & ando in !!! )
---------------
and it shd be evident that haydari is better than kaabi at the moment
------------
and having 2 def mid NEVER covered the area in front of the defenders !!!
despite having TWO players there, we kept on surrendering that crucial zone in the middle to the chinese ..... IN A FREAKING FRIENDLY !!!
I shudder to think how they'll do against a maximum motivated NKorean team.
oh, wait.
I think I do know.
it's going to be the SAME SH*T we've seen in the past whenever we used two DEFENSIVE-MINDED players there.
same crap, same results.
so why the insistence, then?
Comment