Looking at his coaching achievements in IPL and then comparing them to his results at international level, both in ACL as well as with TM, there is a rather big discrepancy.
While he was very successful domestically and still is, he had a rather distastrous ACL campaign with Esteghlal, a disappointing Asian Cup in which his full-strength squad was eliminated by a injury-shook Korean team in quarter finals and now, at halftime of ACL group stage with Sepahan, his team is the weakest Iranian representative with only 2 points out of 3 games.
Not to forget about his failure to send a squad list in time and the following elimination of SS from ACL. Some might think this cannot be counted in, but actually it could be a sign for a rather amateurish working approach.
Now is this all just more a co-incidence? Is it simply an overall weakness of Iranian football these circumstances are a result of? Or is there something more demanding in international football GN just can't answer? If yes, what's that in specific?
In the end there are coaches who had more success on international level, such as Bonacic (ACL final), Ivankovic (AC 3rd), Daei (ACL - undefeated in group stage and advancing to knockout stage), Denizli (ACL quarter finals) or Vingada (ACL knockout stage), but some of them were not closely as successful as Ghalenoei domestically.
So is there something about it or is there no logic behind this?
While he was very successful domestically and still is, he had a rather distastrous ACL campaign with Esteghlal, a disappointing Asian Cup in which his full-strength squad was eliminated by a injury-shook Korean team in quarter finals and now, at halftime of ACL group stage with Sepahan, his team is the weakest Iranian representative with only 2 points out of 3 games.
Not to forget about his failure to send a squad list in time and the following elimination of SS from ACL. Some might think this cannot be counted in, but actually it could be a sign for a rather amateurish working approach.
Now is this all just more a co-incidence? Is it simply an overall weakness of Iranian football these circumstances are a result of? Or is there something more demanding in international football GN just can't answer? If yes, what's that in specific?
In the end there are coaches who had more success on international level, such as Bonacic (ACL final), Ivankovic (AC 3rd), Daei (ACL - undefeated in group stage and advancing to knockout stage), Denizli (ACL quarter finals) or Vingada (ACL knockout stage), but some of them were not closely as successful as Ghalenoei domestically.
So is there something about it or is there no logic behind this?
Comment