yashar jan, I think you'd better read my post.
therein lies a lot of answers you want.
but to make it easy, I'll run thru it , .... again !
1- I did say last year or even 2.
2- ronaldo, raul ... and co. at Madrid, when taken "relatively" ( key word here ) against TM players, considering Iran, is very much alike.
if raul gets benched at real, then by god, anyone at TM can be benched.
3- you either missed the point in me bringing up branko's defensive minded attitude and 7-8 DM's or just dont want to see.
given the formation which stresses on the defenders and defending, with 6 ( out of 10 = 60% ) players given defending duties and positions, leaving only 4 in front, .... also the fact that even after subbing guys like zandi, the player of choice is usually another DM ( or defensive minded ) player like alavi, ...... also the center of gravity of TM which is kept deep into our half, and .... and applying such defensive tactics and teams against teams quarter of our strenght, .....and many more facts, point to one direction.
branko has an ultra-defensive attitude that only point to one thing: a very defensive showing at the WC.
now how this translate to a win against strong teams like portugal, maxico ... , you may be able to answer us.
but remember, stick to facts and examples, keeping in mind the quality of the opposition .... and dont come up with mere rhetorics and general statements.
4- N-kia's form and usefulness, and LB issue,
I dont know if you can read farsi or no.
but if you can, then your anser lies in his latest interview, where he was asked many valid and important Q's ( none of which he was able to answer anyway )
posts # 20 and 21 in :
http://www.persianfootball.com/forum...t=25434&page=2
and btw, whatever navidkia COULD do ( when he was in form ), jabbari can do right now.
so why the need to call an out of form player ?
besides, if we are to accept your reasoning for "trying to keep n-kia's morale up", then plz explain why the double standards in dealing with other players , a total 180 degrees opposite of this .
5- again you didnt get the meaning :
YOU said no option, I gave you those options and more.
YOU said ( rather repeated the trite claims of branko and his fans ) that this is the only player(s) branko can find for this position.
I said, if at all branko is so bothered about DM and getting that vital post right, then why persist with mediocre players, when we have far better players who can perform much better in that position for us?
why shd he stick to his choice of 4 years back ? as if no player will lose form or .... !!!
and for more details, I am sure you can find plenty of threads on branko's selection, tactics, killing of competition , .... in this F+ forum, just a few pages deep.
therein lies a lot of answers you want.
but to make it easy, I'll run thru it , .... again !
1- I did say last year or even 2.
2- ronaldo, raul ... and co. at Madrid, when taken "relatively" ( key word here ) against TM players, considering Iran, is very much alike.
if raul gets benched at real, then by god, anyone at TM can be benched.
3- you either missed the point in me bringing up branko's defensive minded attitude and 7-8 DM's or just dont want to see.
given the formation which stresses on the defenders and defending, with 6 ( out of 10 = 60% ) players given defending duties and positions, leaving only 4 in front, .... also the fact that even after subbing guys like zandi, the player of choice is usually another DM ( or defensive minded ) player like alavi, ...... also the center of gravity of TM which is kept deep into our half, and .... and applying such defensive tactics and teams against teams quarter of our strenght, .....and many more facts, point to one direction.
branko has an ultra-defensive attitude that only point to one thing: a very defensive showing at the WC.
now how this translate to a win against strong teams like portugal, maxico ... , you may be able to answer us.
but remember, stick to facts and examples, keeping in mind the quality of the opposition .... and dont come up with mere rhetorics and general statements.
4- N-kia's form and usefulness, and LB issue,
I dont know if you can read farsi or no.
but if you can, then your anser lies in his latest interview, where he was asked many valid and important Q's ( none of which he was able to answer anyway )
posts # 20 and 21 in :
http://www.persianfootball.com/forum...t=25434&page=2
and btw, whatever navidkia COULD do ( when he was in form ), jabbari can do right now.
so why the need to call an out of form player ?
besides, if we are to accept your reasoning for "trying to keep n-kia's morale up", then plz explain why the double standards in dealing with other players , a total 180 degrees opposite of this .
5- again you didnt get the meaning :
YOU said no option, I gave you those options and more.
YOU said ( rather repeated the trite claims of branko and his fans ) that this is the only player(s) branko can find for this position.
I said, if at all branko is so bothered about DM and getting that vital post right, then why persist with mediocre players, when we have far better players who can perform much better in that position for us?
why shd he stick to his choice of 4 years back ? as if no player will lose form or .... !!!
and for more details, I am sure you can find plenty of threads on branko's selection, tactics, killing of competition , .... in this F+ forum, just a few pages deep.
Comment