Decided to post this thread here, hoping for less emotional replies and more logical ones.
Honestly, at times, I get the feeling that some iranians were born and raised in communist countries.
Some of the replies I read here are incredible.
There are members who expect others to ONLY glorify and praise certain people.
At the moment, one of those people is Carlos Queiroz.
While I'm very happy there is such unconditional support for the man, and I am one of his supporters, I don't like the idea of making him UNTOUCHABLE.
Again, in my opinion, Queiroz is our best bet for success in the long run.
I'm pretty convinced that, god forbid, he won't succeed as Iran coach, we won't get a better man for the job than him.
On the contrary, we'll end up with someone like Mayeli-Kohan.
Knowing the retarded logic of those who run the show in Iran, they'll say:
We hired a big name coach and he got us no where. So, why bother any more?
Lets go with a local solution. An iranian coach is cheaper and knows our culture and football.
And, next thing you know, Mayeli-Kohan, Jalali and Ghalenoei will be battling out for Team Melli's seat.
So, I said all this, hoping to convince EVERYONE once and for all that I am no Queiroz hater / enemy.
I'm just another iranian football fan who, despite backing Queiroz 110%, has some questions.
1- Iran used the exact same line-up in two back-to-back matches, against Maldives, in the span of five days.
Normally, the performance of the TEAM in the second game should have shown slight (again, slight!) signs of improvement.
Instead, Team Melli's display in Male got worse, compared to the game in Tehran.
Why?
2- Almost everyone agreed after the first game that Pouladi, Zare and Nowrouzi dissapointed.
Even Queiroz himself looked to confirm this by subbing these exact players in Tehran.
Surprizingly though, all three were back in the line-up in Male.
They dissapointed again, maybe more.
So, why were they used again, when others like Mahini got no chance to show their abilities?
3- You are 4-0 up from the first game and 1-0 up after the first half of the second match.
Its 5-0 on aggregate. Your team is 99,9% qualified.
You have a forward, Karim Ansarifard, who risks becoming suspended for the all-important first game in the next round.
Why don't you replace him?
4- In your starting "11", there is a 32-year old veteran who even in his prime didn't have the best physical shape.
Your team is playing in the hot and humid Male.
Your 32-year old veteran, Ali Karimi, is having a horrible game.
He gives bad passes left and right.
He is losing those one on one battles.
To top it off, he gets nutmegged by a maldivian opponent.
Why not sub him out with a younger player?
If Karimi shows clear signs that he can't cut it against Maldives, isn't it a good idea to start preparing his replacement by giving him a chance to play in a meaningless game in Male?
5- Hadi Nowrouzi starts two back to back games and shows two horrific performances.
Saeed Daghighi comes in the final 10-12 minutes of the match in Tehran.
He scores one and misses another good chance.
He is not given even one minute of playing time in Male.
Why is that?
Why is it that a player who didn't score and performed poorly got more playing time than a footballer who made the most of the little chance which was given to him?
6- Carlos Queiroz has decided to fly all the way to Brazil to see the World Cup draw in Rio de Janeiro, something he can also watch on TV.
According to press reports, if they are accurate, after the World Cup draw, Queiroz will start a 15-day vacation!
Iranian Premier League kicks-off this coming week.
This means the national team coach has the opportunity to see potential candidates for a place in Team Melli.
Unfortunatly, he won't be able to do that from his home in Portugal.
Another problem: 10th of august is the LAST FIFA DATE before Iran's first World Cup qualifier in september.
Virtually, the entire footballing planet has a game scheduled on this date.
Iran is among a very few countries that won't play anyone on august the 10th.
How could they, when the coach is on vacation?
Does anyone think that Queiroz's vacation comes at a bad time?
Honestly, at times, I get the feeling that some iranians were born and raised in communist countries.
Some of the replies I read here are incredible.
There are members who expect others to ONLY glorify and praise certain people.
At the moment, one of those people is Carlos Queiroz.
While I'm very happy there is such unconditional support for the man, and I am one of his supporters, I don't like the idea of making him UNTOUCHABLE.
Again, in my opinion, Queiroz is our best bet for success in the long run.
I'm pretty convinced that, god forbid, he won't succeed as Iran coach, we won't get a better man for the job than him.
On the contrary, we'll end up with someone like Mayeli-Kohan.
Knowing the retarded logic of those who run the show in Iran, they'll say:
We hired a big name coach and he got us no where. So, why bother any more?
Lets go with a local solution. An iranian coach is cheaper and knows our culture and football.
And, next thing you know, Mayeli-Kohan, Jalali and Ghalenoei will be battling out for Team Melli's seat.
So, I said all this, hoping to convince EVERYONE once and for all that I am no Queiroz hater / enemy.
I'm just another iranian football fan who, despite backing Queiroz 110%, has some questions.
1- Iran used the exact same line-up in two back-to-back matches, against Maldives, in the span of five days.
Normally, the performance of the TEAM in the second game should have shown slight (again, slight!) signs of improvement.
Instead, Team Melli's display in Male got worse, compared to the game in Tehran.
Why?
2- Almost everyone agreed after the first game that Pouladi, Zare and Nowrouzi dissapointed.
Even Queiroz himself looked to confirm this by subbing these exact players in Tehran.
Surprizingly though, all three were back in the line-up in Male.
They dissapointed again, maybe more.
So, why were they used again, when others like Mahini got no chance to show their abilities?
3- You are 4-0 up from the first game and 1-0 up after the first half of the second match.
Its 5-0 on aggregate. Your team is 99,9% qualified.
You have a forward, Karim Ansarifard, who risks becoming suspended for the all-important first game in the next round.
Why don't you replace him?
4- In your starting "11", there is a 32-year old veteran who even in his prime didn't have the best physical shape.
Your team is playing in the hot and humid Male.
Your 32-year old veteran, Ali Karimi, is having a horrible game.
He gives bad passes left and right.
He is losing those one on one battles.
To top it off, he gets nutmegged by a maldivian opponent.
Why not sub him out with a younger player?
If Karimi shows clear signs that he can't cut it against Maldives, isn't it a good idea to start preparing his replacement by giving him a chance to play in a meaningless game in Male?
5- Hadi Nowrouzi starts two back to back games and shows two horrific performances.
Saeed Daghighi comes in the final 10-12 minutes of the match in Tehran.
He scores one and misses another good chance.
He is not given even one minute of playing time in Male.
Why is that?
Why is it that a player who didn't score and performed poorly got more playing time than a footballer who made the most of the little chance which was given to him?
6- Carlos Queiroz has decided to fly all the way to Brazil to see the World Cup draw in Rio de Janeiro, something he can also watch on TV.
According to press reports, if they are accurate, after the World Cup draw, Queiroz will start a 15-day vacation!
Iranian Premier League kicks-off this coming week.
This means the national team coach has the opportunity to see potential candidates for a place in Team Melli.
Unfortunatly, he won't be able to do that from his home in Portugal.
Another problem: 10th of august is the LAST FIFA DATE before Iran's first World Cup qualifier in september.
Virtually, the entire footballing planet has a game scheduled on this date.
Iran is among a very few countries that won't play anyone on august the 10th.
How could they, when the coach is on vacation?
Does anyone think that Queiroz's vacation comes at a bad time?
Comment