First Half:
I’m seeing an un-usual number of useless and foolish lobs and hoofings by the team. As if we don’t have a midfield or the defenders just don’t like the midfield players and want to ignore them!! This TM is a very different team that we saw in tehran scoring 5 goals in 45 minutes. Could the difference be that red card that we were gifted, then? Because we shd be able to deliver even half of the quality we saw in Tehran from more or less the same team. And yet …!
It’s like our team has taken the game as granted and don’t want to put too much effort (physically & mentally) into delivering the goods. Almost as if it’s a friendly!
The Bahrain goal: a series of comical and silly mistakes by our players gifted the goal to them.
Starting with khalatbari’s stupid back-heel, followed by rahmati’s usual problem on long balls which he doesn’t know how to hold them and usually punches or parries them. But this time it was a half hearted attempt at both … as if he didn’t know whether to punch or parry and ended up merely caressing it for the Bahraini attacker!
Rahmati HAS TO get this sorted out for himself. Decide if he wants to punch (which he usually does) or if he wants to simply parry (he doesn’t do this as often on such shots) but he has to do it convincingly. not like this.
============
Second Half:
It’s like this game was destined to be the negative alternate to the first leg. Whoever that did well, did badly (like mahini who was very disappointing today, but was marvelous in tehran) and whoever didn’t do well, did fine in this one (Nekounam who had a poor game in the first leg did very well in fact), so was the situation with the teams and even almost the result (thanks to ghazi’s header and jabbari’s shot).
Very strange two legs.
TM had some good patches in the second half. But they were very patchy and far in between … even though they were applying increasing pressure on Bahrain (half due to Bahrain doing their usual thing and trying to park the bus in front of the goal).
A few points on players:
I think Ghazi is developing very well as a front strong-man (center forward) for the team. His games at TM (even those he hasn’t scored) have been more effective and impressive than the likes of the young ansarifard. But his best games are when our flanks perform well. Today was one of the poorest games by the talented Mahini and I hope this is going to stay as an exception for him.
Having Jabbari in the team I expected far more creativity from him (in absence of karimi and hadadifard). But today, he didn’t impress me as a playmaker. He wasn’t even half of what he was in the first leg.
All of which brings me to the matter of inconsistency among our lads. This level of extreme up and down in quality is simply not acceptable. You just cant have a great game and the next, such a poor one. This HAS TO be addressed by the staff.
I think kazemian came on as a sub. But I hardly heard his name (was watching the English commentary which was incredibly boring!!).
Bottomline: I think CQ aimed for a draw and was just too cautious. And we all know if you aim for a draw, there’s good chance that you may lose. He corrected his selection early into the second half and brought 2 attacking options, with ghazi providing what ansarifard failed.
Let this be a lesson to CQ not to aim for draws and always look for consistency in the team performance.
I’m seeing an un-usual number of useless and foolish lobs and hoofings by the team. As if we don’t have a midfield or the defenders just don’t like the midfield players and want to ignore them!! This TM is a very different team that we saw in tehran scoring 5 goals in 45 minutes. Could the difference be that red card that we were gifted, then? Because we shd be able to deliver even half of the quality we saw in Tehran from more or less the same team. And yet …!
It’s like our team has taken the game as granted and don’t want to put too much effort (physically & mentally) into delivering the goods. Almost as if it’s a friendly!
The Bahrain goal: a series of comical and silly mistakes by our players gifted the goal to them.
Starting with khalatbari’s stupid back-heel, followed by rahmati’s usual problem on long balls which he doesn’t know how to hold them and usually punches or parries them. But this time it was a half hearted attempt at both … as if he didn’t know whether to punch or parry and ended up merely caressing it for the Bahraini attacker!
Rahmati HAS TO get this sorted out for himself. Decide if he wants to punch (which he usually does) or if he wants to simply parry (he doesn’t do this as often on such shots) but he has to do it convincingly. not like this.
============
Second Half:
It’s like this game was destined to be the negative alternate to the first leg. Whoever that did well, did badly (like mahini who was very disappointing today, but was marvelous in tehran) and whoever didn’t do well, did fine in this one (Nekounam who had a poor game in the first leg did very well in fact), so was the situation with the teams and even almost the result (thanks to ghazi’s header and jabbari’s shot).
Very strange two legs.
TM had some good patches in the second half. But they were very patchy and far in between … even though they were applying increasing pressure on Bahrain (half due to Bahrain doing their usual thing and trying to park the bus in front of the goal).
A few points on players:
I think Ghazi is developing very well as a front strong-man (center forward) for the team. His games at TM (even those he hasn’t scored) have been more effective and impressive than the likes of the young ansarifard. But his best games are when our flanks perform well. Today was one of the poorest games by the talented Mahini and I hope this is going to stay as an exception for him.
Having Jabbari in the team I expected far more creativity from him (in absence of karimi and hadadifard). But today, he didn’t impress me as a playmaker. He wasn’t even half of what he was in the first leg.
All of which brings me to the matter of inconsistency among our lads. This level of extreme up and down in quality is simply not acceptable. You just cant have a great game and the next, such a poor one. This HAS TO be addressed by the staff.
I think kazemian came on as a sub. But I hardly heard his name (was watching the English commentary which was incredibly boring!!).
Bottomline: I think CQ aimed for a draw and was just too cautious. And we all know if you aim for a draw, there’s good chance that you may lose. He corrected his selection early into the second half and brought 2 attacking options, with ghazi providing what ansarifard failed.
Let this be a lesson to CQ not to aim for draws and always look for consistency in the team performance.
Comment