Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

WC Tactic Board: Defensive Resilience, Direct Play and Free Kicks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    WC Tactic Board: Defensive Resilience, Direct Play and Free Kicks

    We must accept that Iran is the undoubted underdogs in their group and perhaps in all of world cup.
    We have 2 hard games vs Nigeria and Bosnia and 1 incredibly hard game vs Argentina.

    The friendly versus Belarus told us a lot about our team. Yes we did not have some of our best players (Dejagah, Shojaie, Gucci) and yes both teams were in early preparation but the fact was, our team has certain qualities that will not change much until the world cup and CQ will certainly work around these qualities to best prepare our team for the task ahead. Based on my own observation and the qualities of our current squad, I think TM will need to focus on the below tactical consideration in order to have any form of success:

    1)CQ is undoubtedly working on our defense. We have plenty of players for defense and defensive positions but the key is to find out who are the starters and drill them for the tough world cup games. We will be defending in many layers and we will be doing much defending in our 3 World Cup matches. We need absolute concentration, extremely hard work rate, and no nonsense defending. An example of such defense is Chelsea and how they played this season versus Liverpool in Anfield. I think playing the tape of that match for our boys can be a very good lesson in defending.

    1) Our players generally lack the first touch skills, positioning, off ball movement and decision making skills to play a passing game. Let's face it, even when we play versus weaker Asian teams, we have trouble in build up play and passing game. We are unable to rely on build up play for our attack in the world cup and we lack proper playmakers. It is ironic because we like to think about Iranian football as technical and beautiful but this current team is far from that image. Build up play starts from defense and even our defenders and midfielders are not capable of retaining possession under pressure and working the ball into the box. Due to the lack of this skill in our team, we should forget about build up play as it will expose our defense in case of giving the ball away and chance for success is low.

    2)If build up play is not the way to go, so how can we score in the world cup? The answer is through 2 tactics: Direct Play and Free kicks.
    Team Melli should have plans for every single freekick, corner and indirect free kick opportunities (not to mentione throw ins deep in opponent's half). These chances will be rare and hard to come by but they are immense for us. Teymorian, Dejagah and Shojaie are accomplished crossers and our defenders and midfielders can head a ball or two. If we are to score in the world cup, freekicks will be the (only) way.
    Direct play is not pretty to watch. But it is incredibly potent for our current team. We must look to feed our wingers and strikers with long balls and passes (players like Teymorian and Nekonam are capable of such passes) behind opponent defense. Yes; the success rate of such play is low but if our wingers or striker can hold up play nicely and allow a player or two to peel off, we can have a good chance to score.


    2) One aspect of this team is the improved physical presence and work rate compared to 2006. We have immense physical presence all over the pitch. We may lack speed but we have good strength, heading ability and stamina. This is a good foundation to build our defensive strategy. Our team is more comfortable when NOT in possession and that is totally fine. CQ should prepare our team to play comfortably and contain the opponent for almost the full 90 minutes in all 3 games. We will have a decent chance if our Team Melli is 100% confident and comfortable to defend and contain the play and look for direct play when in possession.
    One area to work on is our full backs. We must absolutely have rock solid full backs. We can not afford to allow their wingers to overlap or string passes together. Our fullbacks should have an extremely high work-rate and minimize any space given to opponent wingers. Even Belarus who is not even a WC tier team and played with very low intensity was able to pass the ball on the wings comfortably, overlap and drill crosses to our box. This is simply unacceptable versus clinical teams of the World Cup.
    Last edited by Hadi; 05-19-2014, 01:29 AM.

    #2
    well, the best game we played at a world cup was IMO:
    Iran vs Yugoslavia.
    and we played a defensive counter attacking football, which worked (aside of the miserable mistake commited by Nakisa...thats's also one reason why I prefer a Bundesliga goalie over IPL goalies who won't make immature mistakes during free-kicks corner kicks etc ala Asian Cup...)!

    We dont have the stamina and speed of Nigeria, Bosnia or Argentina... we will be done after 60-65 mins running... we must play disciplined and stick to the (defensive) tactics of Queiroz!
    thats my two cents....
    CHECK OUT OUR FORUM RULES HERE: http://www.persianfootball.com/forums/faq.php




    Don't Select Players That Suit Your Tactics; Select A Tactic That Suits Your Players !!!

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by Adesor Vafaseya View Post
      well, the best game we played at a world cup was IMO:
      Iran vs Yugoslavia.
      and we played a defensive counter attacking football, which worked (aside of the miserable mistake commited by Nakisa...thats's also one reason why I prefer a Bundesliga goalie over IPL goalies who won't make immature mistakes during free-kicks corner kicks etc ala Asian Cup...)!

      We dont have the stamina and speed of Nigeria, Bosnia or Argentina... we will be done after 60-65 mins running... we must play disciplined and stick to the (defensive) tactics of Queiroz!
      thats my two cents....
      Actually I think the South Africa camp and the Austria camp will take care of the fitness issues just like the 98 team.

      I do agree with the need for TM to play a game similar to the 98 team. Counter attacks and finding space. That is TM's only realistic chance of getting anything good going.

      Comment


        #4
        Klinsman, the head coach of team USA, just cut London Donavan from 23 finnal squad, as well as 4 other faimouse US players...CQ also has said , he need the most ready and the most couragouse players......but, the bottom line, is the TM need, 200% effort, and a faster pace players than a typical team melli game.

        Comment


          #5
          sigpic

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Footbal...he_Asian_Games

          Comment


            #6
            I don't want to brag but the game vs Monte Negro proved some of my points.

            If you watch the highlights, the only chances for Iran came from multiple corner kicks and freekicks. Our crosses were good but our players could not head well which was surprising.

            Expect more of the same in the world cup/

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by Hadi View Post
              I don't want to brag but the game vs Monte Negro proved some of my points.
              If you watch the highlights, the only chances for Iran came from multiple corner kicks and freekicks. Our crosses were good but our players could not head well which was surprising.
              Expect more of the same in the world cup/
              You were pretty much spot on.
              The easiest comparison would be Greece in Euro 2004. That is the style CQ wants to emulate. Tight, everyone keeping the shape of the formation, hustle, aggression and capitalizing on very few chances.

              Comment


                #8
                Re: WC Tactic Board: Defensive Resilience, Direct Play and Free Kicks

                Originally posted by Nokhodi View Post
                You were pretty much spot on.
                The easiest comparison would be Greece in Euro 2004. That is the style CQ wants to emulate. Tight, everyone keeping the shape of the formation, hustle, aggression and capitalizing on very few chances.
                The difference between us and Greece is that we waste too many valuable set pieces and corners while they (Greece) won almost all of their matches in that way.

                Comment


                  #9
                  ^That is why CQ must work extra hard on corners and set pieces.

                  Another aspect that I am worried about is giving away penalties. Our defenders go down too easily and tackle aggressively. We must be very careful vs the likes of Argentina because we will give away many free kicks or even penalties.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    ^
                    yes, specially aregntina is an expert on provoking Penalties. They are very smart in that respect.
                    I don't think though we have seen the final (starting) line-up yet. Quieroz is (was) making the last polishings.
                    CHECK OUT OUR FORUM RULES HERE: http://www.persianfootball.com/forums/faq.php




                    Don't Select Players That Suit Your Tactics; Select A Tactic That Suits Your Players !!!

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Hadi View Post
                      I don't want to brag but the game vs Monte Negro proved some of my points.

                      If you watch the highlights, the only chances for Iran came from multiple corner kicks and freekicks. Our crosses were good but our players could not head well which was surprising.

                      Expect more of the same in the world cup/
                      Crosses:
                      Well that is because we don't have a player like Ghazi or Norouzi in the roster. A player who can tussle with big defenders and tall enough to be a target for these crosses. Barca suffers from the same deficit too.

                      Our set pieces also were a mix of good and bad ones.
                      Corners were the worst. Not only do we need variation. But even the basics are not followed when we send the ball right IN TO the 6 yard box, which is the keeper's safe and easy collection zone.

                      Rahmani is extremely good in set pieces. But was never used and is most probably out of CQ's ultimate roster anyway.

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Our plan certainly is to defend deep with two compact lines of four. Pressing will only be performed very punctually.

                        The strategy to score as said would be
                        a) from set pieces
                        b) from a defensive error after some long ball forward
                        c) after winning the ball during the few pressing attempts

                        The much critisized Shojaei, among others, is important for tactic a) while in the execution of the set pieces the 3+1 version of the fourback plus Nekounam gives us four players with areal strength plus a few semi-dangerous player.

                        Jahanbakhsh already proved he is the master of c). Ghoochannejhad is the man to be most likely to benefit from plan b).

                        It's not the most attractive tactic, but certainly one optimizing our chances.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Originally posted by Doctor DOOM View Post
                          Crosses:
                          Well that is because we don't have a player like Ghazi or Norouzi in the roster. A player who can tussle with big defenders and tall enough to be a target for these crosses. Barca suffers from the same deficit too.

                          Our set pieces also were a mix of good and bad ones.
                          Corners were the worst. Not only do we need variation. But even the basics are not followed when we send the ball right IN TO the 6 yard box, which is the keeper's safe and easy collection zone.

                          Rahmani is extremely good in set pieces. But was never used and is most probably out of CQ's ultimate roster anyway.
                          I diasgree. Our corssing may not be world class but its certainly better than what TM had in recent memory. Barring mahdavikia and his deadly corners, we have way better crossers now.

                          Dejagah is a master of crossing and freekicks. We have Shojaie, Ando, Heydari, who are also pretty good with corner kicks and crosses.

                          I am not too much worried about our crossing.

                          Our finishers though are not as good as what we used to have. Players like Daie, Nosrati, Rahman Rezaie Hashemian etc really attacked the ball and sored good goals.

                          We need Jalal Hosseini, Montazeri, Gucci and Nekonam to be much more aggressive on corner kicks and headers.
                          Last edited by Hadi; 05-27-2014, 06:56 PM.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            ^ I didn't say our crosses were that bad. We do have a few players who can cross well during the open play. Set pieces are a different matter as defenders can come up and join.


                            If you read my post again you'd see my concern is at the end of the cross we don't have proper receivers.
                            Of the players marked for the forward line, several are short players. One is of average height and only two lads are tall enough to have a mathematical chance of affecting these aerial balls.

                            But the tragic irony is that one is just too green and still an enigma (at TM) despite all the well crafted rumors of comparison with Messi. And the other while having the height and body just doesn't know how to use it!

                            So we keep crossing and crossing. And some of these crosses are perfectly fine. But the second part of the equation is missing. A tall physical forward to make use of these crosses.



                            I know a while back I said based on CQ's picks we can pretty much see what tactics he has in mind for the games, which is defend in numbers and layers, compact and rely on fast counters. Hence no room for a regular tall forward who could have a say in open play.
                            But what if we need to go route one? What if we concede a silly goal, ... lets say in the first half against Nigeria or bosnia? Which prompts us to look for goals proactively (as opposed to the passive tactics mentioned above)?

                            What if the opponent scores and then closes the lanes? Then we have to transform our defensive counterattacking team into an offensive one. But one that now, needs strength and fighting ability instead of pace.
                            Here's when players like Norouzi or Ghazi would fit perfectly into a team. But we simply don't have them.


                            Unless, suddenly and overnight ansarifard mutates into a totally different type of player ... that he has not done in the past 3/4 years!
                            Or in this short span we see Azmoun ''travel the journey of a 100 years'' (to quote Farsi proverb) in a matter of days and not only find his footing & confidence, gel with the team, but also start scoring.
                            Now what are the chances of these happening in the next two weeks?

                            Comment


                              #15
                              I'm quite confident Ansarifard and Azmoun are good options if we need a target striker. Also Ghoochannejhad, Dejagah, Shojaei, Jahanbakhsh and the advancing DMs are good targets for Heydari's crosses.

                              But this or that way and regardless of whom CQ invites or lines up and how much he trains the boys, we won't score many goals in Brazil.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X