Originally posted by The
View Post
1) For me Moharammi was piss poor whenever he played for TM but in this tournament he was immense
2) Ramin was a good player for us at times but has dropped the ball in this tournament and was shocking in the WC bar his goal
3) Omid was a good player for us and now he's lost his legs
4) Majid was piss poor for us when he came on as a sub in our first game but against HK was amazing
5) Cheshmi is called out for being our weakest player when in fact he was incredible in midfield against HK and only fumbled once there and twice when he went to defence
6) Kananni was a good defender but has dropped the ball in this tournament
Jahanbaksh is not liked because when you analyse his game you see that he cannot adapt to a game plan that isn't just pressing based. You can have 10 players try to play a strategy but when you have Jahanbakhsh there he simply ruins the plans as he does not possess the technical ability to keep and pass the ball effectively. His great club performances a few years ago relied on his strong physical attributes and time and space to shoot on goal.
I'm sorry but he has never had a great performance for us and whilst I hope he will perform well at a a club level he certainly is not Premier League or top-mid table Championship level. His team in Holland would be low in the Championship table.
Strengths of Jahanbaksh:
1) Physically strong
2) Not a bad crosser of the ball
3) Can play a pressing game
Weaknesses:
1) Lost the ability to shoot anywhere but into the hands of the goalkeeper, like Ehsan
2) Pass accuracy is low
3) Can't keep the ball, like Ramin
4) Isn't a potent goal threat
5) Will take a shot when a better option presents itself, like Ehsan
Comment