Well, we did this after two games played, so let's revisit it now considering not only their performance from the 1st round, but the brackets they're in and potential opponents going forward, rest days in between games, yellow cards, injuries, etc. There are NO rules, so any type of ranking you like is good to go.
I have personally ranked the teams based on their odds (in my opinion) of winning each game going forward, multiplied the odds for all three games to get the overall chance of winning the tournament and ranked them in that order (all teams got a 50/50 chance in the final).
Again, keep in mind that this is not just based on the strength of the teams, but the brackets they're in. My ranking actually came VERY close to may ranking after match day 2:
1 - Iran: 23% (80% QF, 65% / 50% SF, 50% F).
1 - Australia: 23% (70% QF, 50% / 80% SF, 50% F).
3 - Japan: 21% (70% QF, 50% / 70% SF, 50% F)
4 - Korea: 18% (70% QF, 35% / 65% SF, 50% F).
5 - Uzbekistan: 9% (30% QF, 65% / 50% SF, 50% F)
6 - China: 6% (30% QF, 50% / 30% SF, 50% F).
7 - UAE: 5% (30% QF, 50% / 20% SF, 50% F).
8 - Iraq: 4% (20% QF, 35% / 35% SF, 50% F).
I have personally ranked the teams based on their odds (in my opinion) of winning each game going forward, multiplied the odds for all three games to get the overall chance of winning the tournament and ranked them in that order (all teams got a 50/50 chance in the final).
Again, keep in mind that this is not just based on the strength of the teams, but the brackets they're in. My ranking actually came VERY close to may ranking after match day 2:
1 - Iran: 23% (80% QF, 65% / 50% SF, 50% F).
1 - Australia: 23% (70% QF, 50% / 80% SF, 50% F).
3 - Japan: 21% (70% QF, 50% / 70% SF, 50% F)
4 - Korea: 18% (70% QF, 35% / 65% SF, 50% F).
5 - Uzbekistan: 9% (30% QF, 65% / 50% SF, 50% F)
6 - China: 6% (30% QF, 50% / 30% SF, 50% F).
7 - UAE: 5% (30% QF, 50% / 20% SF, 50% F).
8 - Iraq: 4% (20% QF, 35% / 35% SF, 50% F).
Comment