After the game of our U16 team against India, Iran's player Sharifi was interviewed. The thing is the translator totally changed his comments and said totally something else. This is really an intellectual rape that happens in our country, because there is no adequate education on the English language specially for our athletes. I don't know to laugh or cry. You be the judge:
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
How to translate from English to Farsi!!!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Bessos View Posthis namez Mahmad Sharifi and he is player iran team. his say its position is not ??? for me. you can try for better and better.... and you can go to maybe the semee final and final.
He forgot to add aksept and foolooooo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nader25 View PostYa rooz be in Aryan goftam kheily ehssasat shakhsi khodeto va gahi ham harfaye ezafi ra zamime mikoni to tarjomehat.
Khandid faghat va goft intorieh!!??
Albate Aaryan hala meghdari behtar shodeh nesbat be ghadima.
Comment
-
loool, so Estupid..!!
seeing as how most all indians, are somewhat fluent English speakers, sorta make me wish we were occupied by the Brits at some point in the past..!! it gives the foreign students from there such upper-hand when they travel west for college education and beyond..!! and of course helps the country's citizens advance in so many other aspects as well in the world.
it is after all the International Language ..!
Sadly in Iran under IR, I bore witness to fking useless, disgusting ayrabic language courses taking a huge precedent over our English classes in our elementary and well beyond curriculum..!
i guess, you breathe what you sow.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShiroKhorshid View PostSeriously i think every country in the world should make english a subject from grade 1. Three or four hours english from the age of 6 and the world will be able to communicate with each other without any problems.
As far as history goes, very country always wanted to take over others and force their culture, language, way of living and thinking on them, this happened usually by force and sometimes by having a cooler or more advanced cultures. In our time this is happening again with English language. They have managed to make it a standard and slowly more and more people stop learning other languages and only stick to English.
I just came back from a 40 day euro trip and went to 7 different counties, I didn't need to speak a word in any other language and got by with just English, I found it sad because I saw the younger people got the more English they spoke and I can see very soon entire Europe speaking English only just like the entire Arab world. Europe is not the only place, there are many countries with rich cultures who are going down that rout, for example India
Learning is good but as long as you're smart and not fall for their traps. Don't be that kalagh who wanted to learn rah raftane kabk and at the end for got his own way of walking
Comment
-
^ see? This is why shirokhirshid is right. Your response is prime example. If you ... well, lets say were more careful ... you'd have noted he meant as a second language (not primary, replacing one's mother tongue), which is extremely important in today's world. , As BL said, being fluent in an intl language means leaps and bounds of progress and opportunities for a people.
Compared to Indians, who today are well caught after in many sectors of business and technology, if we had te same proficiency of language, we'd have been way ahead of them.
How? Because despite their command in English whuch opens doors for them to te world, they generally can't think outside the box. They are like automatons who've been given a directive and basically do everything by the book, however the book has prescribed. And they re hard working enough to make sure they perform the tasks dutifully and precisely.
But facing a new task or something out of ordinary or expected, they usually get stumped, as the book hasnt covered it. We, in turn, are pretty good at that. We usually , if we get off our butts, do well with outside the box conundrums. But severely lack the discipline and hard work mentality to tune ourselves for such kind of work!
Now if we had that extra advantage of proficiency in English, we'd have done a 100 times better.
To BL, on our wish that the Brits taken hold of India. While it is true that answers the Brits occupied, they left the influence of language behind, big is a plus. But for them, India meant a very different entity than all the other places they occupied and ruled. They had different objectives and plans for that specific country/region (it wasn't a proper country at the time). That's why they instilled a lot of their system from duration, judiciary, ... in there. Just as much as they LEARNT a lot from the Indian systems of education, and society in general. Aside from the riches they stole from he land, they took away a whole lot more learning from social , science, local mdicine, ... offerings India had. Maybe that's why they really invested a lot back into that country.
But I doubt Iran would have meant that much to them except a source of oil. So I doubt they'd have put in as much as they did in India
Comment
-
Note on my post above. A lot of words were autocorrected by my phone. And since the edit option in PFDC sucks as it removes all paragraph spacings , whuch means even more work to do, then you figure out the correct word when you see an unusual word.
Come on chaps. It's only 6 PAINFUL YEARS that I've been screaming about the edit option and properties.
Comment
-
^ I have tried to fix this but I couldn't .. sorry bro, hence if you have a long post do it in text edit programs and paste here.__________________________________________________ ________________________________________
We accept the reality of the world with which we are presented
__________________________________________________ ________________________________________
Comment
footer ad
Collapse
Comment