Originally posted by AIrani
View Post
I wonder what you might say if an American, British, German, or Australian said something to the tune of what you're saying, about Iranians. I can tell you that a Canadian can point to numerous instances of behaviours from Iranians (drug-trafficking, rape, gun fights, fraud) who reside in Canada; would that allow the Canadians to reasonably conclude Iranians are drug dealers, rapists or fraudsters? Hell no. You know this. I know this. But, somehow, you allow yourself you make statements to the same effect about others. You act like it's about Iran, but I suspect that it is not. Your attitude is about you. You need to hang on to a sense of superiority and you use where people are from to get there.
For what it's worth, I went back and reviewed your posts in this thread. I think the best word to describe your attitude is Xenophobia. I should have realized the type of person that you are and allowed you to drown in your own ignorance, instead of making my first post after years of being away from this place about your behaviour. You have no interest in changing. I think you understand that you're wrong. Yet, you double down on your errors, very much like the new American President. I believe it was Shamlu who said you can't make a person, who has an interest in not understanding, understand - he was right.
I understand the dislike of Arabs; I don't excuse it, but considering just the Iran-Iraq war, or just the battles in Khorramshahr, I understand why there is tension and dislike there. I read about what happened and my blood boils. I read about how roughly a 1000 people were fighting against an Army that was advancing with 500 tanks and I feel a little bit teary eyed. I also understand that Saudi Arabia is a political enemy; but at the end of the day, I also realize that a lot of this tension has to do with Shiite vs. Sunni - a distinction that has been used for thousands of years for statesmen to get to power (e.g. Iranians were largely Sunni before the Saffavid dynasty started importing Shiite Mullahs from Iraq so they can make Iranians Shiites, so that they can break free from the Caliphate); also a distinction that hasn't gotten the people who believe in either anywhere close to happiness, wealth, health, affluence ... It has just created division, allowing the people in power to remain in power.
Make no mistake about it - regardless of what you may have done for Iran, and regardless of what you may have seen, you are not allowed the conclusion that Arabs are lazy and stupid; you're not allowed the conclusion that Isfehanis are cheap. You're stuck in the past, with an archaic and untenable world-view, where anyone who is not like you is the enemy.
Is this good? Or would you "reply to another comment in your comments"?
Comment