Faghani nominated for best referee in the world

[Ab-Gosht]

He made a possible mistake on a penalty. But it is very debatable. Why do you guys think?

yes debatable but why didnt they use cideo check? who's call is that? var ref or head ref?

[inarsenewetrust]

yeah I think he messed up there. Should have given a yellow to both silva and vidal as well . Other than that good game.

[Abtin]

He made a possible mistake on a penalty. But it is very debatable. Why do you guys think?

Imo should have gone for the video check. But Chile won on penalties, so I'm glad.

[Abtin]

yeah I think he messed up there. Should have given a yellow to both silva and vidal as well . Other than that good game.

Naarh, he gave enough yellow cards. Video check was right to use here. 👍

[Z Joon]

Faghani nominated for best referee in the world

Lol apparently the Chilean commentator was saying that Faghani is one of the worst refs in the world after than missed penalty call

[Abtin]

Lol apparently the Chilean commentator was saying that Faghani is one of the worst refs in the world after than missed penalty call

rofl apparently he havent seen the Serbian ref from our Argentina match then. Faghani was cool AF today. Yes, Chile deserved to win and they did. But as the Danish commentator said, with those remaining minutes, its very hard for a ref to make such a decision at that time. And also it didnt seem like he had clear view. The Chilean players didnt even complain.

[Kiarash]

Lol apparently the Chilean commentator was saying that Faghani is one of the worst refs in the world after than missed penalty call

Had a pretty solid game tonight. Do the Chileans want to get beaten by Iran again?

[bijbij]

It was a clear penalty imo, why didn't the VAR do anything??

[FeLFeL]

For a physical game of this magnitude, Faghani did a fine job IMO, as good as anyone could've officiated this kind of game and he wasn't fazed by superstars like Ronaldo, Sanchez, and Vidal who got in his face at times to argue calls...He was pretty much in control the whole time maybe besides one instance when there was a bit of confusion on a call, other than that he was level headed and quick with good judgments all the time. Really proud of him for repping Iran on a world stage like Conf. Cup and hope to see more of him in the World Cup as well

[inarsenewetrust]

I really like his demanour. He seems to not try and be center of attention and controversial, and is calm around the players. Could have easily booked vidal for dissent, but again i find when refs do that it is really petty and driven by a big ego. His style is refreshing because he is not intent on being the center of attention. W/ regards to the pk, I think he didnt give it because although there was contact, it wasnt enough in his eyes. IF he thought there was no contact he would have been obligated to book the chilean player for simulation.

[Amin_]

In regards to the pk, I think it was a pk, but since Faghani wasn't sure he relied on the video referees to give judgement, because that's what they are supposed to be doing in such situations!! Those morons apparantly kept quite and of course Faghani just continued.

I just don't hope that those video referees called it a pk and that Faghani overrulled them. Because then it would be a huge mistake.

[Essi]

حلیل AS اسپانیا از قضاوت داور ایرانی

قصه*های ویدئوچک و فغانی در جام کنفدارسیون*ها

اولین بازی مرحله نیمه نهایی جام کنفدراسیون ها در شرایطی با برتری شیلی در ضربات پنالتی و ناکامی قهرمان اروپا در راهیابی به فینال به پایان رسید که قضاوت داور ایرانی سوژه رسانه های معتبر شد.
به گزارش "ورزش سه" به نقل از سایت خبرورزشی، جدال پرتغال با شیلی در نیمه نهایی جام کنفدارسیون ها با قضاوت علیرضا فغانی در حالی به ضربات پنالتی کشیده شد که برخی رسانه های معتبر دنیا از عدم توجه داور ایرانی به قانون جدید ویدئوچک در یکی از جنجالی ترین صحنه های بازی ابراز تعجب کرده و اعتماد به نفس بالای فغانی در تایید تصمیم خود را مورد نکوهش قرار دادند.

در برخی از صحنه ها اعتراض های کریس رونالدو به داور ایرانی بازتاب گسترده ای در رسانه های دنیا داشت که امری طبیعی در فوتبال حرفه ای قلمداد می شود. رونالدو کاپیتان پرتغال بود و گاهی نیاز بود با علیرضا فغانی حرف بزند. با این حال AS اسپانیا بر این عقیده است داور ایرانی به خوبی از قضاوت بازی شیلی – پرتغال بر آمد و این بازی را مدیریت کرد.

رسانه معتبر و پرطرفدار اسپانیایی در تحلیل داوری خود نوشت:« در صحنه بحث برانگیز که کادر فنی تیم شیلی معتقد به خطای پنالتی مدافع پرتغال بود علیرضا فغانی زیر بار استفاده از ویدئوچک نرفت. در این صحنه توپ از پای بازیکن جدا شده بود و مدافع پرتغال در ابتدا به قصد دور کردن توپ پای خود را جلو آورد و برخوردی با مهاجم شیلی داشت که داور ایرانی بازی می توانست از ویدئو چک استفاده کند اما این کار را نکرد و از تصمیم خود کاملا اطمینان داشت. این صحنه کمی بحث برانگیز بود».

این که علیرضا فغانی از ویدئو چک استفاده نکرد در نوع خود جالب بود. با این حال داور ویدئو چک می توانست در گوشی علیرضا فغانی، او را وادار به اتخاذ تصمیم جدیدی بکند که این کار را نکرد و این بدین معنی است که تصمیم علیرضا فغانی از نگاه داور ویدئو چک هم درست بود. از همین رو بسیاری از رسانه های معتبر روسی و دنیا با بیان این که داوری اولین بازی نیمه نهایی مشکل خاصی نداشت به تمجید از تیم داوری ایرانی حاضر در جام کنفدراسیون ها پرداختند و مدعی شدند حتی با وجود قانون ویدئوچک داوران می توانند با اطمینان از تصمیم خود زیر بار استفاده از این قانون نروند.

[bijbij]

On front page of reddit soccer.
https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comm..._chile_no_var/
Apparently faghani refused to use VAR.

[persian_pooya]

That was not a penalty.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

[pres80]

In real time that wouldn't have even looked close to a penalty.

He embelished for sure which probably made it look even less like a penalty in real time.

If he had given the penalty the story now would be why did he give the PK it was soft, he decided the outcome...blah blah blah