Originally posted by saeed_noro
View Post
lol Australia going back, funny, just came and take advantage, now going because it is easier?? 
btw if asia has 8,5 slots, the chance to qualify from asia is still higher than vs. new zealand in an final match
i think your slots are overrated for europe.
I think Russia, Turkey, aserbaidschan, armenia, georgia, cyprus, kazakhstan should stay where they are, not coming back to asia.
I also think, there should be a rule that 16 teams of ONE continent is the maximum possible. south america and north america to be one confederation, is not a bad idea, because this makes qualification more interesting. 6 out of 10 teams is not that fair, but 13,5 out of 41 makes more sense.
16 should be always the maximum number of slots possible for a continent. for example, if one continent collect more points as another continent, they can take their slots.
For the beginning, Europe with 16 teams a maximum and south-north america with 13-14 teams is more than realistic and good. still 41 teams of both continent together is still lesser than africa (53) and asia (45).
I would say:
Europe: 16
American Continent: 13
Africa: 9
Asia: 8,5
Oceanian: 1,5 (to give a team beside new zealand at least an playoff chance vs. Asian No.9 team)
btw if asia has 8,5 slots, the chance to qualify from asia is still higher than vs. new zealand in an final match i think your slots are overrated for europe.
I think Russia, Turkey, aserbaidschan, armenia, georgia, cyprus, kazakhstan should stay where they are, not coming back to asia.
I also think, there should be a rule that 16 teams of ONE continent is the maximum possible. south america and north america to be one confederation, is not a bad idea, because this makes qualification more interesting. 6 out of 10 teams is not that fair, but 13,5 out of 41 makes more sense.
16 should be always the maximum number of slots possible for a continent. for example, if one continent collect more points as another continent, they can take their slots.
For the beginning, Europe with 16 teams a maximum and south-north america with 13-14 teams is more than realistic and good. still 41 teams of both continent together is still lesser than africa (53) and asia (45).
I would say:
Europe: 16
American Continent: 13
Africa: 9
Asia: 8,5
Oceanian: 1,5 (to give a team beside new zealand at least an playoff chance vs. Asian No.9 team)
And 20 is too much for UEFA bro Saeed? Look at the teams that didn't qualify for 2014: Serbia, Scotland, Denmark, Czech,Turkey, Wales, Bulgaria, Hungary, Austria, Ireland, Poland, Montenegro, etc
The only reason I agree with giving 7 to AFC is because of the population factor, the economical factor, and the broadcasting factor. Otherwise, I don't think Asia deserves more than 5... maybe 6 spots.
Comment