If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Persian Gulf League - 2016/2017 | Week 16 - Date/Time (+ LIVE REPORT)
Daei being the typical bad loser hypocrite that he is! Nagging about the referee and how some hidden forces are trying to destroy him and his team lol
Such a bad loser!!
Het won the game against Sepahan and still is nagging about the referee in that game.
Did this hypocrite forget that the reason they are in the Hazfi finals now is because his team was basically handed the victory with that completely BS penalty kick in the 1st minute?!
Whenever his team wins (even when they are given the win by major referee mistakes) it's because of his and his players' hard work and great efforts, but whenever another team wins it's always because of some hidden forces, referees, fans, the pitch, a plane that flew over at the wrong time, a raindrop that fell on his goalkeeper's head...well you name it!
If you're talking about the penalty below, then you're wrong. It's obvious it's a penalty.
It's so obvious I don't know why you would bring it up?
And to compare that to the foul today is absurd. Esteghlal Tehran was gifted an unfair free kick that led to their goal.
Unfortunately in Iran, corruption is so rampant that it's difficult to dismiss Daei's claims. Not saying he is right, but you can't say he is wrong either. We have already had cases with corrupt refs in the IPL.
Beiranvand seems not fully recovered from his injuries. He can not take the FK instantly. The ball bounces off his hands. He needs more training. It is a bad news for Persepolis and Team Melli. If I was Branko and CQ I would think of a replacement for now to give him more time for a perfect recovery. Beiranvand is NT asset and should take this thing seriously, fast recovery is not the answer all the time.
First off, many different "karshenase davaris" said that that scene was no pk!! Second, sometimes it looks like that some people have been following football for just 3 weeks now! Baba jaan, football is not black and white! It's no schoolbook theory class! Every situation needs its own interpretation! The Naft player shot the ball soo hard that the ball reached Rahmati in a fraction of a second while he himself had just entered the penalty box!
Even Usain Bolt on top speed would not have caught up to that ball! Hell, even Usain Bolt's ammeh on a motorcycle wouldn't have reached that ball before it reached Rahmati! Lol
I advice you to watch EPL for a while and to start playing the game yourself, perhaps you can learn a thing or two about how the game is played in real life. Then perhaps you see that you can not just look at a certain scene black and white from one player's objective without taking anything else into consideration, like f.e. the fact that the ball was soo far away from him that he could have never reached it before Rahmati grabbed it! You can not just say "he got touched, so it should always be a fk/pk"! There's a big difference between a player getting touched while the ball is just infront of his foot, or when he just kicked the ball 100 meters in front of him and the ball is reaching an opponent, the opponent's gk, or is fastly going out of the pitch!
First off, many different "karshenase davaris" said that that scene was no pk!! Second, sometimes it looks like that some people have been following football for just 3 weeks now! Baba jaan, football is not black and white! It's no schoolbook theory class! Every situation needs its own interpretation! The Naft player shot the ball soo hard that the ball reached Rahmati in a fraction of a second while he himself had just entered the penalty box!
Even Usain Bolt on top speed would not have caught up to that ball! Hell, even Usain Bolt's ammeh on a motorcycle wouldn't have reached that ball before it reached Rahmati! Lol
I advice you to watch EPL for a while and to start playing the game yourself, perhaps you can learn a thing or two about how the game is played in real life. Then perhaps you see that you can not just look at a certain scene black and white from one player's objective without taking anything else into consideration, like f.e. the fact that the ball was soo far away from him that he could have never reached it before Rahmati grabbed it! You can not just say "he got touched, so it should always be a fk/pk"! There's a big difference between a player getting touched while the ball is just infront of his foot, or when he just kicked the ball 100 meters in front of him and the ball is reaching an opponent, the opponent's gk, or is fastly going out of the pitch!
None of that matters. If a foul is committed in the penalty box it is a penalty, unless it is an indirect kick foul.
"If a player commits a direct free kick offence within his own penalty area, a penalty kick is awarded irrespective of the position of the ball, provided the ball is in play."
According to these rules and theoratically, we should see at least 10 pk's every game at every corner kick! Have you seen what is going on in the penalty box during a corner kick?! Defenders are constantly grabbing their opponents, pulling and shoving them, jumping on eachother's backs etc. All "fauls" and things a referee would blow his whistle for if happened in the middle of the pitch! However, in practice 99 out of the 100 times there is no pk given!
So again football is no black and white highschool theory class! Every situation needs its own interpretation! Just like the example I gave above with the corner kicks, and like I said in my previous post, you can not just say "a player got touched, so it should ALWAYS be a fk/pk"! Becuse again, if that would be the case we would have seen at least a dozen pk's every match during every corner kick or a fk that is crossed into the penalty area!
Comment