Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
US, Canada, Mexico will host World Cup 2026!
Collapse
X
-
If you connect all the perimeter cities hosting the 2026 World Cup, the area of the territory inside is a mind-blowing 11.2 million square kilometers!
To put that in perspective, that's:
* 4.9 times the size of the territory covered by Russian host cities.
* 2.5 times the size of the territory covered by Brazilian host cities.
* 17.5 times the size of the territory covered by South African host cities.
That much travelling is just going to be insane. I just hope they have enough sense to put all the group matches in cities that are close together.
Comment
-
Originally posted by KeonKish View PostAnd about Morocco’s bid.
I looked at their stadiums and claiming that they are better than Iran’s is a stretch. They are the same old and crappy style
They almost all looked bad like Iran’s older ones.
Building everything would have been super hard on the economy. Even a country like Brazil with a HUGE economy took a huge negative impact after the World Cup, and many Brazilians are pissed about it.
At least with this bid new stadiums won’t really need to be constructed. Mexico has great stadiums and I’d personally love to watch a game in the Azteca(Mexican azadi) or BBVA Monterrey another great stadium.
But members here need to be much more respectful of our Moroccan members.
Some of you guys are just saying ignorant things.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Comment
-
Woah this is weird, FIFA actually used my idea of the playoff test tournament. WTF IS HAPPENING??!?!?!
I think I'm being watched. They're stealing my ideas!
Originally posted by EKBATAN View Postall this expansion and the best continent Europe only gets 3 more spots
Comment
-
Originally posted by eerooni View PostOnce an amazing product ( WC) gets commercialized. then quality goes down , who the hell wants to see 48 teams in a supposed competition that only the BEST THE FINEST should enter!??!!!
Comment
-
if italy holland usa ghana chile etc were good then they would be in the world cup. 48 teams won't make the competition better. its like banging a fat chick.
I'm not gonna watch irans first 2 asian cup matches vs yemen and vietnam but you bet your ass i will watch them soorkah iraq without al-bin williamsSHOW TIME!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Sam van Dam View Postif italy holland usa ghana chile etc were good then they would be in the world cup. 48 teams won't make the competition better. its like banging a fat chick.
I'm not gonna watch irans first 2 asian cup matches vs yemen and vietnam but you bet your ass i will watch them soorkah iraq without al-bin williams
Comment
-
Originally posted by Keano View PostAll of the above are still better than 1/2 of the teams in this World Cup. No matter how bad Italy or Netherlands are, it's still a delight to watch them in World Cup (They're never all that bad nonetheless)
and i don't wanna here the italy had to play spain. in the playoffs they lost to sweden because their coach couldn't figure it out.
USA lost to TNT :ROFL: even saudi could beat TNT
Iran qualified by playing every match 11 v 12
Italy vs. Myanmar in 2026 gonna be the match of the centurySHOW TIME!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Keano View PostNevermind, We're not understanding each other's point!
i just feel that a 32 team format is much better and gives purpose for qualifiers. that feeling when we qualified after azizi's goal in 97 or gucci's goal in 2013 is something that will live in our minds forever. a pretty much automatic qualification would not.
trust me id rather have the likes of use ghana italy netherlands etc. in the World Cup over the likes of panama iceland or saudi arabia, but again its the qualification process and all 31 teams had to earn their way in, 48 teams would make it less enjoyable.
and i was just as shocked as anybody when italy did not qualify. they've been a staple in the world cup for over 60 yearsSHOW TIME!
Comment
footer ad
Collapse
Comment