come on have some shame with some of these arguments.
CQ set up a tactical masterclass that put our national team on a level where they could seriously beat anybody on any given night. Only 1/6 matches in WC was TM not in with a strong chance of winning, and he improved that from Bosnia game by ensuring players had the physical ability to last 3 matches. At the end of the day, CQ put us in a position where if taremi takes any of 1 of his 4 golden chances in WC we top a group with Spain, Portugal, and Morocco.
And IDK how you can downplay quality of that morocco side. On paper they are 30x stronger than TM, with world class talent, and were well coached, and gave spain and portugal a lot of problems too.
TM had a real identity. We could hang with any national team in the world. We had one freak result vs Japan after 8 years, and even then the game was very in the balance after 45 mins. It is not unheard of to conceded 1 then concede 2 on the break in knockout football.
Now, this is not to say that TM didnt have limitation under CQ. But those were being slowly addressed too with incorporation of gholizadeh, ghoddos, etc to add to our creative abilities. Emergence of a more technical RB in moharrami, etc. These things are a process. It took him 8 years to build a team with proper physical qualities and priniciples of shape, defensive positioning, etc. The next logical steps were better play through the midfield and a upping of our creative output.
But to downplay the level he got TM playing at as just parking the bus, not exciting, blah blah blah screams of pure ignorance. what I would give to be able to go into ANY match vs any opposition thinking TM has a fair shot of winning, and if not winning, making life extremely difficult for the opposition again...man.
Comment