If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2022 Qualifiers - Other Games Thread (AFC & beyond)
This is getting ridiculous. By the same token, FIFA should exclude many other countries for committing war crimes. Their mantra ‘sports seperated from politics’ is the biggest nonsense ever…
They only separate sport from politics when it is in their favor $$$
This is very akin to what I've noticed for The Hague's prosecution of war criminals. It's only applicable to those who are not part of NATO/US/Israel/Australia alliance (ie most of the non-white population of the world). Basically, they come up with feel-good, soundbites for "rule of law", but only apply them selectively to those they are in conflict with. Everyone else gets a pass.
So what if you bomb a soveirgn nation on false pretenses, kill 1,000,000 of their people, cover their country in depleted Uranium, and leave it for ISIS to take over? (rhetorical question)
This is very akin to what I've noticed for The Hague's prosecution of war criminals. It's only applicable to those who are not part of NATO/US/Israel/Australia alliance (ie most of the non-white population of the world). Basically, they come up with feel-good, soundbites for "rule of law", but only apply them selectively to those they are in conflict with. Everyone else gets a pass.
So what if you bomb a soveirgn nation on false pretenses, kill 1,000,000 of their people, cover their country in depleted Uranium, and leave it for ISIS to take over? (rhetorical question)
The alliance you quote successfully convince the world they are the good with a strong soft power.
This is very akin to what I've noticed for The Hague's prosecution of war criminals. It's only applicable to those who are not part of NATO/US/Israel/Australia alliance (ie most of the non-white population of the world). Basically, they come up with feel-good, soundbites for "rule of law", but only apply them selectively to those they are in conflict with. Everyone else gets a pass.
So what if you bomb a soveirgn nation on false pretenses, kill 1,000,000 of their people, cover their country in depleted Uranium, and leave it for ISIS to take over? (rhetorical question)
This is why they call the International Criminal Court the International Caucasian Court... lol
Russia, a country who split Iran in half, occupied Iran in WW2, and is continuing to lend legitimacy to IR by sucking the rest of the country's resources ..... let's not shed tears for this criminal regime ...... Yes, the west is bad, and the west has committed arocitites, ....... but do we have a single member here who lives in Russia ?
“It is easier to fool the people, than to convince them they have been fooled." - Mark Twain
I agree. But here is a silver lining...let's rally Fifa to ban Saudi for their war on Yemen. How can they justify one ban and not another?
How good would it feel to knock the KSA out without playing them lol would rather not have them embarrass Asia any further.
Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
Ukraine has no negative prejuges and one can twist the facts as you want, it's nearly impossible to convince people ukraine is responsible.
About war in the middle east, the Muslim suffer from negative prejuges and painted as antagonist to the first world (white) dominating the world. Then it is easy to paint them as the bad guy : find a dictator or a resistance axis and some smart communication.
Comment