Originally posted by O-ZoNe
View Post
The only metric we have for Skocic is playing vs Asian opponents and the end results thus far were favorable (except the Korea game). However, statistically speaking we have had on average as much attacking chances with him compared to CQ but on the other hand we have been extremely vulnerable defensively by giving 2x to 3x more chances to the opponents. During the last WCQ we've been lucky that our opponents did not have a half decent finishers otherwise the results would have been a little less glamorous. As an example, on both our games against UAE we gave up possession (55/45 "Away" and 60/40 "Home") with total of 11 shots against our goal on the last match (that's about roughly the number of shots Argentina and Portugal had against us). Another comparison, when we played S. Korea in Tehran with CQ we allowed them 1 shot (0 on target) but with Skocic it was 16 shots.
I strongly believe that with Skocic we will be playing 3 compact and defensive games in the world cup, with fingers crossed that both Azmoun and Taremi are in good form and can snatch us a goal on a counter or through some individual heroism. My only concern is that our defense has been gradually regressing to a "bezan ziresh" approach, so I hope that I'm wrong and that there is a different side to Skocic that we haven't seen yet, but that would be a lot to wish for as most likely this team will be poorly prepared for the WC due to our incompetent federation and a yes man coach who would not speak out if his job is at risk.
Comment