Look there are some inherently flawed logic in your post and I wont for a second stop arguing my standpoint unless there are good reasons for doing so. First of all, reality speaks against every argument you throw. How many iranian players have succeded in EPL? Why is this the case? Let us start the discussion here if we want to move forward and learn something together. If we cant have reasonable discussions and deliberate about this then discussions are of no value.
Secondly we have to make a distinction between rotting at the bench and getting treated as a commodity and bulk commodity for 3 years. Is this reasonable? Does the name tag of EPL justify sitting on a bench and NOT develop? There is a wide difference between trying your wings for a year or so and wasting alternative opportunities. The difference between Jahanbakhsh time in brighton and Feyenoord is that Feyenoord actually gave him a chance and that he thrives in that country. This is the key difference, dutch teams, portugese teams etcetera cannot afford splurging money and actually to a larger degree and extent commit to their players, its more mutuality and less of a one way street in this regard. This is the reason he has come back. He had 1 year after being benched for what 3 years to readapt and learn Slots system. This is reasonable and we ought to be patient. As mentioned earlier 3 years being benched is foolish.
Thirdly, you are manipulating the conversation by making a dichotomy between Arab teams/IPL and EPL. Everyone is in agreement that IPL/Arab teams isnt an option. Try finding one person arguing that a player should go to arab teams or IPL? I bet you will not find any.
Fourth: Ghoddos is a good player, but his position is quite stacked in TM. But here you have a point regarding Ghoddos being subpar compared to other players in TM in his position. Now I dont completely agree with you: but for the sake of the argument, if he is this shitty as you make it out to be, what business does he have being benched in EPL? Is this reasonable? This argument puts the finger on the whole issue: maybe our players cant make it in EPL because of their overall level. Is it or is it not more reasonable to join a top team in a slightly lesser league that is not this unforgiving? I would argue that it is. First thing first: succeed in lesser leagues competetive top teams, then make the transfer. Not the other way around.
Secondly we have to make a distinction between rotting at the bench and getting treated as a commodity and bulk commodity for 3 years. Is this reasonable? Does the name tag of EPL justify sitting on a bench and NOT develop? There is a wide difference between trying your wings for a year or so and wasting alternative opportunities. The difference between Jahanbakhsh time in brighton and Feyenoord is that Feyenoord actually gave him a chance and that he thrives in that country. This is the key difference, dutch teams, portugese teams etcetera cannot afford splurging money and actually to a larger degree and extent commit to their players, its more mutuality and less of a one way street in this regard. This is the reason he has come back. He had 1 year after being benched for what 3 years to readapt and learn Slots system. This is reasonable and we ought to be patient. As mentioned earlier 3 years being benched is foolish.
Thirdly, you are manipulating the conversation by making a dichotomy between Arab teams/IPL and EPL. Everyone is in agreement that IPL/Arab teams isnt an option. Try finding one person arguing that a player should go to arab teams or IPL? I bet you will not find any.
Fourth: Ghoddos is a good player, but his position is quite stacked in TM. But here you have a point regarding Ghoddos being subpar compared to other players in TM in his position. Now I dont completely agree with you: but for the sake of the argument, if he is this shitty as you make it out to be, what business does he have being benched in EPL? Is this reasonable? This argument puts the finger on the whole issue: maybe our players cant make it in EPL because of their overall level. Is it or is it not more reasonable to join a top team in a slightly lesser league that is not this unforgiving? I would argue that it is. First thing first: succeed in lesser leagues competetive top teams, then make the transfer. Not the other way around.
Originally posted by Karimi 8
View Post
Comment