Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

World Cup 2010 Ranking 9-32

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    World Cup 2010 Ranking 9-32

    09 Japan
    10 US
    11 Korea
    12 Slovakia
    13 Portugal
    14 Mexico
    15 England
    16 Chile

    17 Slovenia
    18 Swiss
    19 South Africa
    20 Australia
    21 Ivory Coast
    22 New Zealand
    23 Serbia
    24 Denmark
    25 Greece
    26 Italy
    27 Nigeria
    28 Algeria
    29 France
    30 Honduras
    31 Cameroon
    32 North Korea

    #2
    France should be above Honduras. Both have even points and goal difference but France has scored more goals.
    I went to Sharif University. I'm a superior genetic mutation, an improvement on the existing mediocre stock.

    Comment


      #3
      this ranking compares apples with oranges.
      its useless.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by KC McElroy View Post
        France should be above Honduras. Both have even points and goal difference but France has scored more goals.
        I fixed it.

        Originally posted by soniq View Post
        this ranking compares apples with oranges.
        its useless.
        It is not about which team is better. It is just official business. This is the WC2010 rank that FIFA use , for instance in seeding top countries - though I doubt any of the above teams will be seeded in 2014 except England. Usually they use the rankings of the past 2-3 WCs and FIFA rankings of the past 3 years.
        This WC was a bit unusual in that they only used the FIFA ranking at the time of seeding, which probably was to knock off France from being seeded.

        This ranking is also used in seeding Asian qualifiers for 2014 WC.
        Japan in group A and Korea in group B as the top seed of the group.

        It is possible to have
        Japan
        Australia
        Saudi Arabia
        Iran
        Iraq
        China

        in one group. That should be something to watch.

        But for a real group of death I would put Korea instead of Japan though Japan are more highly regarded internationally.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by malleus View Post
          I fixed it.
          It is not about which team is better. It is just official business. This is the WC2010 rank that FIFA use , for instance in seeding top countries - though I doubt any of the above teams will be seeded in 2014 except England. Usually they use the rankings of the past 2-3 WCs and FIFA rankings of the past 3 years.
          This WC was a bit unusual in that they only used the FIFA ranking at the time of seeding, which probably was to knock off France from being seeded.
          This ranking is also used in seeding Asian qualifiers for 2014 WC.
          Japan in group A and Korea in group B as the top seed of the group.
          It is possible to have
          Japan
          Australia
          Saudi Arabia
          Iran
          Iraq
          China
          in one group. That should be something to watch.
          But for a real group of death I would put Korea instead of Japan though Japan are more highly regarded internationally.
          theyre changing it every year. they made it by confederations this time. so the full asian group theory isnt yet possible.


          S - E - C - U - L - A - R - I - S - M

          Comment

          Working...
          X