The issue of Technology for England,Mexico and Everyone Else

[HuSsAiN]

At Old Trafford, with the score 1-0 and United in the ascendency, Chelsea went 2-0 up thanks to a goal scored by Drogba, who had received the ball in an offside position. http://therepublikofmancunia.com/wp-...04/Offside.jpghe said. said Blatter of the English and Mexican FAs.

[soheil86]

inter also won serie A because of the referee blunders in 2007/2008(they scored i think 11 offside goals) and 2009/2010.

[Masoud_A]

The issue is that Ironically Brits have always been the reason FIFA never been able to bring in technology to help the referees, they always oppose this and talk about traditional football and such bullshit.

[HuSsAiN]

The issue is that Ironically Brits have always been the reason FIFA never been able to bring in technology to help the referees, they always oppose this and talk about traditional football and such bullshit.

What makes you think that only the British want goal-line technology?

[Masoud_A]

What makes you think that only the British want goal-line technology?

I said, Brits are the reason technology hasnt been introduced to help the referees, do you get it? It means Brits have a veto right in FIFA and they have been using it not to let this happen.

[EKBATAN]

its funny that some people never say shit when italy gets robbed


2006 world cup final, france got awarded a penalty kick on a malouda dive where he didnt even get touched, that was in min. 5 of the FINAL....that obviously messed up the game and threw italy off, but some people dont like to admit that, instead they said italy cheated cuz zidane couldnt hold his temper against materazzi




in any case, blatter already said next month they're gonna take a look at video replay options and he apologized to england and mexico national teams already....i think they'll come up wiht a solution cuz too many people are complaining

[IranSoccer#8]

They should use that chip in the ball thing. They used it at the club world cup a few years ago and it seemed to work fine.

[HuSsAiN]

its funny that some people never say shit when italy gets robbed


2006 world cup final, france got awarded a penalty kick on a malouda dive where he didnt even get touched, that was in min. 5 of the FINAL....that obviously messed up the game and threw italy off, but some people dont like to admit that, instead they said italy cheated cuz zidane couldnt hold his temper against materazzi




in any case, blatter already said next month they're gonna take a look at video replay options and he apologized to england and mexico national teams already....i think they'll come up wiht a solution cuz too many people are complaining

This was written by a Manchester United fan living in England, so he based on mostly EPL things.. I'm sure there are many situations where other teams have been robbed.

[Shervin.]

I said, Brits are the reason technology hasnt been introduced to help the referees, do you get it? It means Brits have a veto right in FIFA and they have been using it not to let this happen.

do you have any ****ing idea what the **** you are saying? FIFA doesnt work like this. Every country doesnt send a representative like the UN who can then veto. I agree there are many englishmen who say they want to keep it the same, but even more who want change. You seem to be so anti english that what your saying alot of the time is just...i dunno.

[HuSsAiN]

do you have any ****ing idea what the **** you are saying? FIFA doesnt work like this. Every country doesnt send a representative like the UN who can then veto. I agree there are many englishmen who say they want to keep it the same, but even more who want change. You seem to be so anti english that what your saying alot of the time is just...i dunno.

He's German.. wot did you expect ?

[Masoud_A]

do you have any ****ing idea what the **** you are saying? FIFA doesnt work like this. Every country doesnt send a representative like the UN who can then veto. I agree there are many englishmen who say they want to keep it the same, but even more who want change. You seem to be so anti english that what your saying alot of the time is just...i dunno.

He's German.. wot did you expect ?

For jackass big mouthed pricks who need a lesson:
The International Football Association Board (IFAB) is the body that determines the Laws of the Game of association football.
IFAB is made up of representatives from each of the United KingdomFootball Association (The FA), the Scottish Football Association (SFA), the Football Association of Wales (FAW) and Northern Ireland's Irish Football Association (FIFA), the international governing body for football. Each UK association has one vote and FIFA has four. IFAB deliberations must be approved by at least six votes. Thus, FIFA's approval is necessary for any IFAB decision, but FIFA alone cannot change the Laws of the Game; they need to be agreed by at least two of the UK members.

[Shervin.]

yet no one in FIFA wants technology. blatter and his crew have all said that. So it doesnt matter what uk asociations think. FIFA have made it clear, THEY dont want it. Or at least they didnt