Originally posted by yashar_fasihnia
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
franck Ribery: I can match Messi
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by futbol>>>IRAN View Postactually if you saw their games, you saw their inability to deal with set pieces, like the first goal they conceded against Uruguay which was a crap goal.
and for all the stars and potence they have upfront, they should still be winning insptie of conceding 1 goal every now and then otherwise they are not championship material which they proved.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yashar_fasihnia View Postagain, nobody denies their weakness in defense, but u cant expect them not to concede any goal at all.
and for all the stars and potence they have upfront, they should still be winning insptie of conceding 1 goal every now and then otherwise they are not championship material which they proved.
also you have to acknowledge that uruguay is a well organised team with one of the strongest defenses in world football. they finished 4th in the world cup. you can't ever expect anything against a team like uruguay.
off topic.. uruguay is the best football nation in the world per capita. for a nation of just 2million to produce the players and achievements in football that they have done is outstanding . Goes to show that football is a game of quality and not quantity.
Comment
-
Originally posted by EKBATAN View Posti dont get how the TEAM affects his individual skills? makes no sense. ur telling me he can dribble 3 people in barcelona cuz of xavi and iniesta's presence but in argentina he loses focus and trips over his foot?
Comment
-
Originally posted by futbol>>>IRAN View Postit wasn't just one game where they couldn't deal with set pieces, it was a reoccurring problem. they just couldn't deal with them.
also you have to acknowledge that uruguay is a well organised team with one of the strongest defenses in world football. they finished 4th in the world cup. you can't ever expect anything against a team like uruguay.
off topic.. uruguay is the best football nation in the world per capita. for a nation of just 2million to produce the players and achievements in football that they have done is outstanding . Goes to show that football is a game of quality and not quantity.
not because of their inability to deal with set pieces.
uruguay was just one opponent. argentina was poor against weaker opponents as well.
nice stats, thanx. however, to me they sound more like a bahrain of asia, who had a relatively good set of players come together at a period of time and do well.
otherwise, uruguay for 40 years has been doing absolutely nothing except for this last worldcup.
ofcourse, uruguay is on a much higher level than bahrain, but im talking relative international football to asian football.
Comment
-
Originally posted by yashar_fasihnia View Postnice stats, thanx. however, to me they sound more like a bahrain of asia, who had a relatively good set of players come together at a period of time and do well.
otherwise, uruguay for 40 years has been doing absolutely nothing except for this last worldcup.
ofcourse, uruguay is on a much higher level than bahrain, but im talking relative international football to asian football.
uruguay has won the world cup twice and won the copa america 14 times and if they win the final it will be a new record!
even though they haven't achieved much in recent history they still have been a competitive team which has qualified for world cups and done well in copa. last copa they made the semi's and lost to brazil.
bahrain hasn't even qualified for the world cup.
Comment
-
Originally posted by futbol>>>IRAN View Postthats a terrible comparison
uruguay has won the world cup twice and won the copa america 14 times and if they win the final it will be a new record!
even though they haven't achieved much in recent history they still have been a competitive team which has qualified for world cups and done well in copa. last copa they made the semi's and lost to brazil.
bahrain hasn't even qualified for the world cup.
in the past 40 years, uruguay has either not qualified, or exited at the group stages or best in the round of 16 in the worldcups. not a very good record.
again, the idea is that uruguay has been a nobody for so long, for decades, (similar to that of spain ) and now just 1 worldcup, they came and did something. its cos they have a good squad come together during an era (just like bahrain who had a golden generation for asian level ofcours). time will tell how consistent they will remain
Comment
-
Originally posted by yashar_fasihnia View Postwe are not talking about 1930 and 1950.
in the past 40 years, uruguay has either not qualified, or exited at the group stages or best in the round of 16 in the worldcups. not a very good record.
Originally posted by yashar_fasihnia View Postagain, the idea is that uruguay has been a nobody for so long, for decades, (similar to that of spain ) and now just 1 worldcup, they came and did something. its cos they have a good squad come together during an era (just like bahrain who had a golden generation for asian level ofcours). time will tell how consistent they will remain
Comment
-
Originally posted by futbol>>>IRAN View Postthe thing is bahrain never achieved anything! your just using the population similiarities as an example when its irrelevant. Right now its fair to say uruguay is the 3rd best team in south america.
i'm not have this discussion with you but i will ask you to look at the fifa rankings.
uruguay is same story, every once in a few decades, they have a golden
generation coming together, doing something noticeable and then fade away.
but the difference is, bahrain doing something on asian level is noticeable, uruguay doing something on international level is something noticeable.
how is it fair to say uruguay is the 3rd best team in south america? based on wat exactly? on their players? ur personal preference?
they havent beaten paraguay in the final yet to be better than paraguay if u want to use copa america as a measuring scale.
why not say they are the best team in south america? they achieved more than brazil and argentina, both in the worldcup and the copa america! so why not the best south american team?
based on history and achievements? argentina has won the worldcup twice, so has uruguay. argentina has won copa america 14 times, so has uruguay and if they win it today, they set a new record! so why not the 2nd best team of south america?
in the end, it all comes down to how we see, and more importantly, how we want to see it.
for me, uruguay is a good team, but teams like paraguay and chile arent any worse. it depends on the draw u get in a tournament, the fitness situation of ur team and the opponents team and ofcoures, the incidents that happen during the game.
but one thing is for sure, ur obssession for one hit wonders and inconsistent never seems to endLast edited by yashar_fasihnia; 07-22-2011, 01:54 AM.
Comment
-
Still a shit load less than what Messi requiresOriginally posted by Milad-69 View Postdifference is 2 Ballon D'ore honours between the 2 men . No matter what he requires , he has shown that he is the best player in world football, Ribery has not.
Comment
footer ad
Collapse
Comment