Confederations Cup 2017

[DR Strangemoosh]

!!!!!

I didn't get your "if they really beat CQs Iran, then they must be good... waoo!" comment agha.

[Adesor Vafaseya]

I didn't get your "if they really beat CQs Iran, then they must be good... waoo!" comment agha.

I quoted yourself.
You said they (ALMANIHAA) are the only team that can beat CQs Iran. And I said if they really do it, they must be good.

[DR Strangemoosh]

I quoted yourself.
You said they (ALMANIHAA) are the only team that can beat CQs Iran. And I said if they really do it, they must be good.

No I didn't and it's pretty clear what I meant.

I said that with this new highly-disciplined iteration of Iran, I would expect traditionally top teams such as Argentina, France, Spain etc... to struggle to break down the Iranian unit. I don't think they would beat Iran by more than one goal throughout the course of a match.

I said quite clearly that the only team that would be able to beat Iran by "A FEW GOAL MARGIN" (i.e. 3-0 or 4-0) is Germany, as their brand of devastating (not to say, quite attractive) football can stymie Iran's tight unit which would otherwise absorb sustained attacks from other nations. Iran is likely to falter under sustained pressure, CQ himself has mentioned this. This is very different from your sarcastic misinterpretation that just beating Iran means "they are good, waooo".

Not sure what's so controversial about my argument to warrant your sarcasm, also don't understand this new-found antagonism you have. Cheers.

[Adesor Vafaseya]

No I didn't and it's pretty clear what I meant.

I said that with this new highly-disciplined iteration of Iran, I would expect traditionally top teams such as Argentina, France, Spain etc... to struggle to break down the Iranian unit. I don't think they would beat Iran by more than one goal throughout the course of a match.

I said quite clearly that the only team that would be able to beat Iran by "A FEW GOAL MARGIN" (i.e. 3-0 or 4-0) is Germany, as their brand of devastating (not to say, quite attractive) football can stymie Iran's tight unit which would otherwise absorb sustained attacks from other nations. Iran is likely to falter under sustained pressure, CQ himself has mentioned this. This is very different from your sarcastic misinterpretation that just beating Iran means "they are good, waooo".

Not sure what's so controversial about my argument to warrant your sarcasm, also don't understand this new-found antagonism you have. Cheers.

There is nothing wrong what you said, in fact its very true and I only highlighted that.
Also there is no new antagonism, rather existing protagonism.

[DR Strangemoosh]

There is nothing wrong what you said, in fact its very true and I only highlighted that.
Also there is no new antagonism, rather existing protagonism.

My misunderstanding Senor Vafaseya.

[Adesor Vafaseya]

My misunderstanding Senor Vafaseya.

no you didn't, not totally.... hehehe

I was just messing with you baba.... relax