agha bahram, we can play like holland and spain but if we put rasoul khatibi or arash borhani upfront, u think we will win?
wat is being ignored here is while spain and holland were playing possession football, their forwards were scoring which helped them win.
infact, in the worldcup, spain played a very good possession football but A LOT OF individual skill of their striker, mainly david villa came to their rescue.
the game against paraguay, spain had a lot of possession but struggle to win. it was villas brilliant lef footed lob over the exiting goal keeper which helped them win. and all those penalty controversies happened otherwhies maybe spain would have been knocked out by paraguay!
against germany, it was a header from a corner kick by puyol which gave them the win.
against holland, it was robben missing 2 chances and iniesta's brilliant skill in extra time which made spain the worldcup.
also during the worldcup, spain played possession football against switzerland but lost because switzerland made use of the opportunities it had while spain wasted theirs.
however, spain had a higher chance of winning by creating more chances which was supported by having possession.
even having more possession doesnt mean u can create a lot of chances. again going back to jose mourinho's intermilan last year in champions league, inter milan had around 35% possession against barcelona and bayern in the semis and finals (both of them play possession football), but was able to defeat both of them with a 2 goal margin!
yet another example is this years bayern, who play possession football under
van gaal but they are belo teams like hannover and previously mainz and freiburg in the table simply because their strikers were misfiring the huge number of opportunities they were creating while teams like hannover were scoring from the minimum opportunities they had and getting the 3 points of each game.
and i dont even need to mention greece and how they won the euro.
yes, playing like spain and holland increases the chances of a team winning a match, but doesnt guaranty it. and not to forget, baghiye team ham choghondar nistan.
spaniya ba unhame ghodrato, setarehasho possession footballesh tu har bazi ba hezar zuro badbakhti bord, az paraguay gerefte ta alman va holland va tu hame bazia har lahze emkane bakhtesham bud!
--------------------------
but yes, with the football talent iran has in general, if it can manage to set up a league and long temr program like japan, and its league hire coaches who can adopt a possession type of football, then we will definitely perform much better than wat we are currently doing, but again, that wont guaranty us trophies and victories against the east asians.
wat is being ignored here is while spain and holland were playing possession football, their forwards were scoring which helped them win.
infact, in the worldcup, spain played a very good possession football but A LOT OF individual skill of their striker, mainly david villa came to their rescue.
the game against paraguay, spain had a lot of possession but struggle to win. it was villas brilliant lef footed lob over the exiting goal keeper which helped them win. and all those penalty controversies happened otherwhies maybe spain would have been knocked out by paraguay!
against germany, it was a header from a corner kick by puyol which gave them the win.
against holland, it was robben missing 2 chances and iniesta's brilliant skill in extra time which made spain the worldcup.
also during the worldcup, spain played possession football against switzerland but lost because switzerland made use of the opportunities it had while spain wasted theirs.
however, spain had a higher chance of winning by creating more chances which was supported by having possession.
even having more possession doesnt mean u can create a lot of chances. again going back to jose mourinho's intermilan last year in champions league, inter milan had around 35% possession against barcelona and bayern in the semis and finals (both of them play possession football), but was able to defeat both of them with a 2 goal margin!
yet another example is this years bayern, who play possession football under
van gaal but they are belo teams like hannover and previously mainz and freiburg in the table simply because their strikers were misfiring the huge number of opportunities they were creating while teams like hannover were scoring from the minimum opportunities they had and getting the 3 points of each game.
and i dont even need to mention greece and how they won the euro.
yes, playing like spain and holland increases the chances of a team winning a match, but doesnt guaranty it. and not to forget, baghiye team ham choghondar nistan.
spaniya ba unhame ghodrato, setarehasho possession footballesh tu har bazi ba hezar zuro badbakhti bord, az paraguay gerefte ta alman va holland va tu hame bazia har lahze emkane bakhtesham bud!
--------------------------
but yes, with the football talent iran has in general, if it can manage to set up a league and long temr program like japan, and its league hire coaches who can adopt a possession type of football, then we will definitely perform much better than wat we are currently doing, but again, that wont guaranty us trophies and victories against the east asians.
Comment